Cited by 134Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Inhibitory Control During Emotional Distraction Across Adolescence and Early Adulthood

Open access
Cohen-Gilbert, Julia E, Thomas, Kathleen M·2013·Child Development

Abstract

This study investigated the changing relation between emotion and inhibitory control during adolescence. One hundred participants between 11 and 25 years of age performed a go-nogo task in which task-relevant stimuli (letters) were presented at the center of large task-irrelevant images depicting negative, positive, or neutral scenes selected from the International Affective Picture System. Longer reaction times for negative trials were found across all age groups, suggesting that negative but not positive emotional images captured attention across this age range. However, age differences in accuracy on inhibitory trials suggest that response inhibition is more readily disrupted by negative emotional distraction in early adolescence relative to late childhood, late adolescence, or early adulthood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.12085

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TD youth show increased ability to regulate negative emotion with age.

    “TD youth also show increased ability to regulate negative emotion with age.”

    From Trauma, PTSD, and the Developing Brain (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Discussion reports that older adolescents maintained inhibitory accuracy during negative emotional distraction better than younger adolescents. But the finding is not a general, steady increase in the ability to regulate negative emotion with age: early adolescents performed worse than both older adolescents and late-childhood participants, and the Limitations section says the study cannot distinguish regulatory ability from the salience of the negative images. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Slower reaction times were found across all age groups for negative trials in a go/no-go task with task-irrelevant negative, positive, neutral or scrambled background images.

    “Slower reaction times were found across all age groups for negative trials.”

    From Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence (2015) · cites this paper as Cohen-Gilbert and Thomas (2013)

  • Some studies have found evidence of a non-linear trajectory, with increased interference in mid-adolescence compared with earlier childhood.

    “some studies have found evidence of a non-linear trajectory, with increased interference in mid-adolescence compared with earlier childhood (e.g. Cohen-Gilbert and Thomas, 2013).”

    From Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence (2015) · cites this paper as Cohen-Gilbert and Thomas, 2013

  • Lower accuracy on no-go trials in the presence of negative images was seen specifically in adolescents aged 13-14 years and in girls aged 15-16.

    “lower accuracy on no-go trials in the presence of negative images was seen specifically in adolescents aged 13–14 years (and in girls aged 15–16).”

    From Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence (2015) · cites this paper as Cohen-Gilbert and Thomas (2013)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Steinberg L Dahl R Keating D Kupfer DJ Masten AS Pine DS 2006 The study of developmental psychopathology in adolescence: integrating affective neuroscience with the study of context 710 741 Annals of the New York Accademy of Science

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen-Gilbert, J. E., & Thomas, K. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Child Development
Published
2013-11-01
Volume
84
Issue
6
Pages
1954-1966
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2106876266
Cited by
134
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Center for Neurobehavioral Development (NIH T32 MH73129)
  • Center for Cognitive Sciences (NIH T32 HD007151)
  • University of Minnesota
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
inhibitory control, emotional distraction, adolescence, early adulthood, response inhibition, emotional attention, go/no-go task, age differences, emotional valence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attention, Child, Discrimination, Psychological, Emotions, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sex Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review