Cited by 365Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and Testing

Predicting Cognitive Control From Preschool to Late Adolescence and Young Adulthood

Eigsti, Inge-Marie, Zayas, Vivian, Mischel, Walter, Shoda, Yuichi, Ayduk, Ozlem, Dadlani, Mamta B., Davidson, Matthew C., Aber, J. Lawrence +1 more·2006·Psychological Science

Abstract

In this longitudinal study, the proportion of time preschoolers directed their attention away from rewarding stimuli during a delay-of-gratification task was positively associated with efficiency (greater speed without reduced accuracy) at responding to targets in a go/no-go task more than 10 years later. The overall findings suggest that preschoolers' ability to effectively direct their attention away from tempting aspects of the rewards in a delay-of-gratification task may be a developmental precursor for the ability to perform inhibitory tasks such as the go/no-go task years later. Because performance on the go/no-go task has previously been characterized as involving activation of fronto-striatal regions, the present findings also suggest that performance in the delay-of-gratification task may serve as an early marker of individual differences in the functional integrity of this circuitry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01732.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This differential in impulse control appears to remain throughout adolescence and young adulthood.

    “This differential in impulse control appears to remain throughout adolescence and young adulthood (Eigsti et al. 2006).”

    From <i>The Adolescent Brain</i> (2008) · cites this paper as Eigsti et al. 2006

  • Executive control is a strong predictor for various life outcomes, such as academic achievement, socioeconomic status, and physical health.

    “The fact that EF may be improved by means of cognitive training is of particular importance in childhood and adolescence, because EF is a strong predictor for various life outcomes, such as academic attainment, socioeconomic status, and physical health (e.g., Eigsti et al., 2006; Blair and Razza, 2007; Moffitt et al., 2011).”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Eigsti et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eigsti, I.-M., Zayas, V., Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., Ayduk, O., Dadlani, M. B., Davidson, M. C., Aber, J. L., & Casey, B. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Department of Psychology, Cornell University
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Eigsti, Inge-Marie
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2006-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
478-484
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2126043413
Cited by
365
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 29
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH063255, R37-MH39349, R01 MH 63255, R37MH039349)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21 DA 15882, R01DA018879, R21DA015882)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive control, delay of gratification, go/no-go task, inhibitory control, attentional control, preschool children, developmental precursors, frontostriatal circuits, individual differences, executive function, longitudinal development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Prospective Studies, Reaction Time, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review