Cited by 180Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Cognitive efficiency on a match to sample task decreases at the onset of puberty in children

McGivern, Robert F, Andersen, Julie, Byrd, Desiree, Mutter, Kandis L, Reilly, Judy·2002·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

Electrocortical evidence indicates that a wave of synaptic proliferation occurs in the frontal lobes around the age of puberty onset. To study its potential influence on cognition, we examined 246 children (10-17 years) and 49 young adults (18-22 years) using a match-to-sample type of task to measure reaction times to assess emotionally related information. Based upon the instruction set, subjects made a yes/no decision about the emotion expressed in a face, a word, or a face/word combination presented tachistoscopically for 100 ms. The faces were images of a single individual with a happy, angry, sad or neutral expression. The words were 'happy,' 'angry,' 'sad,' or 'neutral,' In the combined stimulus condition, subjects were asked to decide if the face and word matched for the same emotion. Results showed that compared to the previous year, reaction times were significantly slower for making a correct decision at 11 and 12 years of age in girls and boys, the approximate ages of puberty onset. The peripubertal rise in reaction time declined slowly over the following 2-3 years and stabilized by 15 years of age. Analyses of the performance of 15-17 year olds revealed significantly longer reaction times in females to process both faces and words compared to males. However, this sex difference in late puberty appeared to be transient since it was not present in 18-22 year olds. Given the match-to-sample nature of the task employed, the puberty related increases in reaction time m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0278-2626(02)00012-x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pubertal dip in performance is linked to the proliferation of synapses that occurs at the onset of puberty.

    “The researchers linked this pubertal dip in performance to the proliferation of synapses that occurs at the onset of puberty.”
  • After puberty, from age 13-14, performance on the match-to-sample task improved until it returned to the pre-pubescent level by about 16-17 years.

    “After puberty, from age 13-14, performance improved until it returned to the pre-pubescent level by the age of about 16-17 years.”
  • After puberty, excess synapses are pruned into specialised, efficient networks, which may explain the post-pubescent improvement on the match-to-sample task.

    “Only later, after puberty, are the excess synapses pruned into specialised, efficient networks which may explain the post-pubescent improvement on this table (McGivern et al., 2002).”
  • A 10-20% increase in reaction time on the match-to-sample task occurred at the onset of puberty in the 10-11-year-old group of girls and in the 11-12-year-old group of boys, compared to the previous year group of each sex.

    “A 10-20% increase in reaction time on the match-tosample task occurred at the onset of puberty in the 10-11-year-old group of girls and in the 11-12-yearold group of boys, compared to the previous year group of each sex (age 9-10 and 10-11 in girls and boys, respectively) (see Figure 4).”
  • McGivern et al. (2002) found a non-linear pattern of development in a match-to-sample task.

    “A non-linear pattern of development was found in a recent behavioural study that used a match-tosample task (McGivern, Andersen, Byrd, Mutter, & Reilly, 2002).”

    From Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition (2006) · cites this paper as McGivern, Andersen, Byrd, Mutter, & Reilly, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGivern, R. F., Andersen, J., Byrd, D., Mutter, K. L., & Reilly, J.
Affiliations
San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
McGivern, Robert F
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
73-89
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963627663
Cited by
180
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
puberty onset, synaptic pruning, frontal lobe maturation, reaction time, matching-to-sample, emotional processing, facial expression recognition, sex differences, cognitive efficiency, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Child, Cognition, Facial Expression, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Puberty, Reaction Time, Sex Factors, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review