Cited by 40Child Welfare and AdoptionIron Metabolism and DisordersChild Nutrition and Water Access

Beyond Stimulus Deprivation: Iron Deficiency and Cognitive Deficits in Postinstitutionalized Children

Open access
Doom, Jenalee R, Gunnar, Megan R, Georgieff, Michael K, Kroupina, Maria G, Frenn, Kristin, Fuglestad, Anita J, Carlson, Stephanie M·2014·Child Development

Abstract

Children adopted from institutions have been studied as models of the impact of stimulus deprivation on cognitive development (Nelson, Bos, Gunnar, & Sonuga-Barke, 2011), but these children may also suffer from micronutrient deficiencies (Fuglestad et al., 2008). The contributions of iron deficiency (ID) and duration of deprivation on cognitive functioning in children adopted from institutions between 17 and 36 months of age were examined. ID was assessed in 55 children soon after adoption, and cognitive functioning was evaluated 11–14.6 months postadoption when the children averaged 37.4 months old ( SD = 4.9). ID at adoption and longer duration of institutional care independently predicted lower IQ scores and executive function (EF) performance. IQ did not mediate the association between ID and EF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.12231

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doom, J. R., Gunnar, M. R., Georgieff, M. K., Kroupina, M. G., Frenn, K., Fuglestad, A. J., & Carlson, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Doom, Jenalee R
Venue
Child Development
Published
2014-09-01
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
1805-1812
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2021094194
Cited by
40
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota (MH080905, MH078105, R01HD051495)
  • NIMH (T32MH015755)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
iron deficiency, institutionalized children, cognitive impairment, executive function, IQ, micronutrient deficiency, stimulus deprivation, adoption, early childhood
MeSH terms
Iron Deficiencies, Adoption, Child, Institutionalized, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Infant, Intelligence, Iron, Sensory Deprivation, Time Factors, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review