Cited by 79Ovarian function and disordersEndometriosis Research and TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Effect of the combined oral contraceptive pill and/or metformin in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review with meta‐analyses

Open access
Teede, Helena, Tassone, Eliza C., Piltonen, Terhi, Malhotra, Jaideep, Mol, Ben W., Peña, Alexia, Witchel, Selma F., Joham, Anju +5 more·2019·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has a prevalence of 8%‐13%. Given the prevalence, diverse health impacts and variation in care, rigorous evidence‐based guidelines are needed in PCOS management. This systematic review with meta‐analyses aimed to investigate the effect of the combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) and/or metformin in the management of hormonal and clinical features of PCOS, to inform international guidelines. Methods: Electronic databases were searched systematically from inception until 11 January 2017 to inform the guideline process. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials which investigated the effect of COCPs and/or metformin alone or combined on hormonal and clinical features in women with PCOS. Outcomes were prioritized as critical for informing a decision about an intervention or important or not important, according to GRADE. Articles were assessed by one author against selection criteria, in consultation with a second author. Data were double extracted independently by four authors, and data quality appraisal was completed. Meta‐analyses were conducted, where appropriate. Results: Fifty‐six studies were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes prioritized by women and health professionals included the following: irregular cycles, insulin resistance, weight, BMI, thromboembolic events and gastrointestinal effects. In low‐quality evidence in adolescents, meta‐analyses demonstrated that metformin was better than COCP for BMI (mean difference [MD] −4.02 [−5.23, −2.81], P < 0.001); COCP was better than metformin for menstrual regulation (MD −0.19 [−0.25, −0.13], P < 0.00001). In low‐quality evidence in adults, meta‐analyses demonstrated that metformin was better than placebo for BMI (MD −0.48 [−0.94, −0.02], P = 0.04); metformin was better than COCP for fasting insulin (MD 4.00 [2.59, 5.41], P = 0.00001), whereas COCP was better than metformin for irregular cycles (MD 12.49 [1.34, 116.62], P = 0.03). Combined oral contraceptive pill alone was better than the combination with an anti‐androgen for BMI (MD −3.04 [−5.45, −0.64], P = 0.01). Metformin was associated with generally mild gastrointestinal adverse events. Differences in statistical significance were observed when outcomes were subgrouped by BMI. Conclusions: This review identified that COCP therapy has benefits for management of hyperandrogenism and menstrual regulation. Metformin combined with the COCP may be useful for management of metabolic features. There is minimal evidence of benefits of adding an anti‐androgen to COCP therapy. Metformin alone has benefits for adult women for management of weight, hormonal and metabolic outcomes, especially for women with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 . There is inadequate evidence to suggest the optimal COCP formulation, or dosing regimen and formulation of metformin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cen.14013

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of COCPs containing CPA is not recommended as first-line treatment due to increased risk of venous thromboembolism in the general population.

    “however, the use of COCPs containing CPA is not recommended as first-line treatment due to the increased risk of venous thromboembolism in the general population (12, 16).”

    From Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [12]

    Box 1 (p. 8) says that 35 μg ethinyloestradiol plus cyproterone acetate (CPA) preparations should not be first-line in PCOS because of adverse effects, including venous thromboembolic risk, in line with general-population guidelines. The citing sentence extends that recommendation to all COCPs containing CPA; the passage specifies one formulation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • COCP are generally regarded as more effective than metformin for management of hyperandrogenism and menstrual regulation in PCOS.

    “Generally combined oral contraceptive pills (COCP) are regarded as more effective than metformin for the management of hyperandrogenism and menstrual regulation in PCOS (11, 12).”

    From Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [12]

    The COCP-versus-metformin results for adults (section 3.6, p. 6) favor COCP for androgen measures and irregular cycles. In adolescents (section 3.5, p. 6), COCP improved menstrual regulation more, but the review found no significant difference in the reported androgen measures. The claim is therefore supported for adults, but its broad hyperandrogenism comparison across PCOS is not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Our systematic review confirms that metformin is superior to COCP in lowering fasting insulin levels.

    “Our systematic review confirms that metformin is superior in lowering fasting insulin levels, total cholesterol, and triglycerides compared with COCP, in line with findings reported previously (12).”

    From Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [12]

    Section 3.6 (p. 6) reports significantly better fasting-insulin results with metformin than with COCP in adults with PCOS. The claim does not specify adults: Section 3.5 (p. 6) found no significant fasting-insulin difference in adolescents. The full citing sentence also claims superiority for total cholesterol, for which Section 3.6 reports no significant difference. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Our systematic review confirms that metformin is superior to COCP in lowering total cholesterol.

    “Our systematic review confirms that metformin is superior in lowering fasting insulin levels, total cholesterol, and triglycerides compared with COCP, in line with findings reported previously (12).”

    From Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [12]

    Section 3.6 (p. 6) reports that metformin improved fasting insulin compared with COCP, but found no statistically significant difference in total cholesterol. Thus the cited review supports the fasting-insulin part of the citing sentence, not its claim that metformin was superior at lowering total cholesterol. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Our systematic review confirms that metformin is superior to COCP in lowering triglycerides.

    “Our systematic review confirms that metformin is superior in lowering fasting insulin levels, total cholesterol, and triglycerides compared with COCP, in line with findings reported previously (12).”

    From Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [12]

    Section 3.11 (p. 7) reports lower triglycerides with metformin than with metformin plus COCP, but that is not the claimed comparison with COCP alone. For the direct comparison in adolescents, section 3.5 (p. 6) reports no statistically significant triglyceride difference; section 3.6 (p. 6) does not report triglyceride superiority in adults. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teede, H., Tassone, E. C., Piltonen, T., Malhotra, J., Mol, B. W., Peña, A., Witchel, S. F., Joham, A., McAllister, V., Romualdi, D., Thondan, M., Costello, M., & Misso, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Monash Health (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Oulu University Hospital (FI)
  • Rainbow Hospital &amp; Malhotra Nursing and Maternity Home Agra India
  • Women's and Children's Hospital (AU)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Polycystic Ovary Association of Australia Sydney New South Wales Australia
  • Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Teede, Helena
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-17
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
479-489
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W2945153056
Cited by
79
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, combined oral contraceptives, metformin, menstrual regulation, insulin resistance, body mass index, hyperandrogenism, androgen receptor antagonists, thromboembolic events, gastrointestinal adverse effects, adolescents, weight loss, fasting insulin, hirsutism, acne, rosacea, hypertriglyceridemia
MeSH terms
Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Metformin, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review