Cited by 698Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsEndometriosis Research and Treatment

Insulin-sensitising drugs (metformin, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, D-chiro-inositol) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome, oligo amenorrhoea and subfertility

Open access
Tang, Thomas, Lord, Jonathan M, Norman, Robert J, Yasmin, Ephia, Balen, Adam H·2012·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is characterised by infrequent or absent ovulation, and high levels of androgens and insulin (hyperinsulinaemia). Hyperinsulinaemia occurs secondary to insulin resistance and is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. Insulin-sensitising agents such as metformin may be effective in treating PCOS-related anovulation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of insulin-sensitising drugs in improving reproductive and metabolic outcomes for women with PCOS undergoing ovulation induction. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases from inception to January 2017: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL. We searched registers of ongoing trials and reference lists from relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of insulin-sensitising drugs compared with placebo, no treatment, or an ovulation-induction agent for women with oligo and anovulatory PCOS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: statistic and reported quality of the evidence for primary outcomes using GRADE methodology. MAIN RESULTS: = 52%, very low-quality evidence). D-chiro-inositol (2 studies), rosiglitazone (1 study) or pioglitazone (1 study) versus placebo or no treatmentWe were unable to draw conclusions regarding other insulin-sensitising drugs as no studies reported primary outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our updated review suggests that metformin alone may be beneficial over placebo for live birth, although the evidence quality was low. When metformin was compared with clomiphene citrate, data for live birth were inconclusive, and our findings were limited by lack of evidence. Results differed by body mass index (BMI), emphasising the importance of stratifying results by BMI. An improvement in clinical pregnancy and ovulation suggests that clomiphene citrate remains preferable to metformin for ovulation induction in obese women with PCOS.An improved clinical pregnancy and ovulation rate with metformin and clomiphene citrate versus clomiphene citrate alone suggests that combined therapy may be useful although we do not know whether this translates into increased live births. Women taking metformin alone or with combined therapy should be advised that there is no evidence of increased miscarriages, but gastrointestinal side effects are more likely.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd003053.pub5

Cites

201 of 201 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two prior systematic reviews of metformin alone versus placebo or no intervention in PCOS found no effect on BMI.

    “Two other systematic reviews on metformin alone compared with placebo or no intervention in PCOS, showed no effect on BMI (Lord et al. , 2003; Tang et al. , 2012).”
  • Metformin is prescribed to target insulin resistance and pre-diabetes risk, androgen production, cardiometabolic risk factors and reproductive concerns.

    “Metformin was prescribed in 8% and 44% of respondents at diagnosis and at follow-up clinic visits, respectively, to target insulin resistance and pre-diabetes risk, androgen production, cardiometabolic risk factors and reproductive concerns [67–70].”
  • A Cochrane meta-analysis showed a reduction in fasting glucose with metformin compared to placebo or no treatment, with mean difference −0.14 mmol/L (95% CI −0.21 to −0.07).

    “However, a Cochrane meta-analysis [47] evaluating as secondary outcome fasting glucose levels has shown a reduction in fasting glucose with metformin compared to placebo or no treatments, with mean difference (MD −0.14 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.21 to −0.07).”
  • Metabolic outcomes were assessed by all the reviews with important results: reduced insulin levels, reduced glucose levels and HOMA-IR, and improved blood pressure, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein.

    “Metabolic outcomes were assessed by all the reviews with important results: reduced insulin levels [47, 72, 85], reduced glucose levels and HOMA-IR, and improved blood pressure, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein [86].”
  • Three reviews including 62 trials with 5072 women with PCOS evaluated the efficacy of inositol in PCOS; endocrine outcomes were assessed by all the reviews with benefits reported in testosterone, DHEA, or androstenedione levels.

    “Three reviews including a total of 62 trials with 5072 women with PCOS evaluated the efficacy of inositol in PCOS [47, 85, 86]. Endocrine outcomes were assessed by all the reviews with benefits reported in testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), or androstenedione levels.”

Cites

4 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, T., Lord, J. M., Norman, R. J., Yasmin, E., & Balen, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Royal Cornwall Hospital (GB)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Leeds General Infirmary (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-16
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
CD003053-CD003053
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2149842750
Cited by
698
References
201
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 43
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Keywords
metformin, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, D-chiro-inositol, polycystic ovary syndrome, subfertility, anovulation, ovulation induction, clomiphene citrate, live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia
MeSH terms
Anovulation, Clomiphene, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Infertility, Female, Inositol, Insulin Resistance, Metformin, Ovulation Induction, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Pregnancy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pregnancy Rate, Thiazolidinediones, Live Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review