Cited by 17Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsEndometriosis Research and Treatment

Oral contraceptives (OCs) in combination with metformin versus OCs alone on metabolism in nonobese polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Wu, Limei, Liu, Ye, Huang, Xi, Lin, Kaiping, Liu, Yang, Li, Zhizun, Wei, Tianqin, Song, Ling +2 more·2023·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare OCs(oral contraceptives) + metformin and OCs alone for metabolic effects in nonobese polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients. METHODS: The search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov for all published studies up to 30 April 2022 and was limited to English-language articles. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OCs + metformin and OCs alone for reproductive-age women with PCOS were included. Data were processed using Revman 5.3 software. RESULTS: Of 396 studies identified, 14 RCTs were included for analysis comprising 707 women. OCs+metformin significantly modified fasting glucose (MD = -0.21 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.31, -0.12], p < .00001) and fasting insulin (MD = -2.54 [95%CI = -4.04, -1.04], p = .0009) at study completion compared with OCs alone in nonobese PCOS subjects. There was no statistic difference in the homoeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), total cholesterol or triglycerides at study end between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin, via its positive effects on insulin clearance, in combination with OCs, improved glucose metabolism and offered a good treatment alternative in nonobese women with PCOS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cen.14895

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two systematic reviews found that adding metformin to COCP and anti-androgens improved BMI.

    “Two systematic reviews found that adding metformin to COCP and anti-androgens improved BMI and glucose tolerance (11, 88).”

    From Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Abstract describes a systematic review comparing oral contraceptives plus metformin with oral contraceptives alone in nonobese women with PCOS. The outcomes listed in the Conclusion are glucose and lipid measures, not BMI; the review also does not assess adding metformin to an anti-androgen regimen. It therefore does not support the attributed BMI improvement. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two systematic reviews found that adding metformin to COCP and anti-androgens improved glucose tolerance.

    “Two systematic reviews found that adding metformin to COCP and anti-androgens improved BMI and glucose tolerance (11, 88).”

    From Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Overall results (§3.5.1) report lower fasting glucose with metformin plus oral contraceptives than with oral contraceptives alone in nonobese women with PCOS. The review does not report a glucose-tolerance outcome or evaluate adding metformin to a separate anti-androgen treatment, so those parts of the attributed claim are not established. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, L., Liu, Y., Huang, X., Lin, K., Liu, Y., Li, Z., Wei, T., Song, L., Hua, Y., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • Chengdu Second People's Hospital (CN)
  • People's Hospital of Kaizhou District (CN)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Jianyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital Jianyang Sichuan People's Republic of China
  • Dazhou Central Hospital (CN)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Bishan Hospital Chongqing People's Republic of China
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Hua, Yuanyuan
  • Wang, Xiaoli
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-04-07
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
3-16
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W4321164479
Cited by
17
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Keywords
oral contraceptives, metformin, polycystic ovary syndrome, non-obese women, glucose metabolism, fasting insulin, insulin resistance, HOMA-IR, dyslipidemia, insulin clearance
MeSH terms
Contraceptives, Oral, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Metformin, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review