Cited by 197Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsObesity, Physical Activity, DietPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Does using the Internet facilitate the maintenance of weight loss?

Harvey-Berino, J, Pintauro, S, Buzzell, P, DiGiulio, M, Casey Gold, B, Moldovan, C, Ramirez, E·2002·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a weight maintenance program conducted over the Internet. Design Longitudinal, clinical behavioral weight loss trial with 6-month in-person behavioral obesity treatment followed by a 12-month maintenance program conducted both in-person (frequent in-person support; F-IPS, minimal in-person support; M-IPS) and over the Internet (Internet support; IS). Subjects A total of 122 healthy, overweight adults (age=48.4+/-9.6, BMI=32.2+/-4.5 kg/m(2), 18 male) Measurements Body weight, dietary intake, energy expended in physical activity, attendance, self-monitoring, comfort with technology. Results Results (n=101) showed that weight loss did not differ by condition during treatment (8.0+/-5 vs 11+/-6.5 vs 9.8+/-5.9 kg, P=0.27 for IS, M-IPS and F-IPS, respectively). The IS condition gained significantly more weight than the F-IPS group during the first 6 months of weight maintenance (+2.2+/-3.8 vs 0+/-4 kg, P<0.05) and sustained a significantly smaller weight loss than both in-person support groups at the 1 y follow-up (-5.7+/-5.9 vs -10.4+/-9.3 vs -10.4+/-6.3 kg, P<0.05 for IS, M-IPS and F-IPS, respectively). Attendance at maintenance meetings was greater for the F-IPS than the IS condition over the 1 y maintenance program (54 vs 39%, P=0.04). Acceptability of assigned condition was higher for subjects in the F-IPS than IS condition. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that Internet support does not appear to be as effective as minimal or frequent intensive in-person therapist support for facilitating the long-term maintenance of weight loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802051

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Internet-based weight-loss programmes have mostly been labour-intensive, requiring considerable counselling input from health-care professionals.

    “Many have used email or telephone to support a web-based programme with weekly assignments. They have mostly been labour-intensive, requiring considerable counselling input from health-care professionals.”

    From Weight loss by mobile phone: a 1-year effectiveness study (2009) · cites this paper as [5]

  • Long-term (12-month) reductions in weight and waist circumference in the experimental group were equal to or greater than those previously reported from minimal-contact or minimal-advice programmes and from more labour-intensive Internet-based programmes.

    “Long-term (12-month) reductions in weight and waist circumference in the experimental group were equal to or greater than those previously reported from minimalcontact or minimal-advice programmes (15-19) and from more labour-intensive Internet-based programmes (1,3-7) .”

    From Weight loss by mobile phone: a 1-year effectiveness study (2009) · cites this paper as [5]

  • Previous research into the effectiveness of Internet-based weight-loss programmes has presented short- to medium-term results indicating slightly better performance or no difference when compared with traditional programmes.

    “Previous research into the effectiveness of Internet-based weight-loss programmes (4-7) has presented short- to medium-term results indicating slightly better performance or no difference when compared with traditional programmes.”

    From Weight loss by mobile phone: a 1-year effectiveness study (2009) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvey-Berino, J., Pintauro, S., Buzzell, P., DiGiulio, M., Casey Gold, B., Moldovan, C., & Ramirez, E.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2002-08-21
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1254-1260
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2158259761
Cited by
197
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
20.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
weight loss maintenance, obesity treatment, behavioral weight loss, overweight adults, treatment attendance, treatment acceptability, self-monitoring, technology comfort
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Behavior Therapy, Body Weight, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Time Factors, Weight Loss, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review