Cited by 85Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsEndometriosis Research and Treatment

Role of exercise training in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Benham, J. L., Yamamoto, J. M., Friedenreich, C. M., Rabi, D. M., Sigal, R. J.·2018·Clinical Obesity

Abstract

Preliminary evidence suggests exercise in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) may improve reproductive and cardiometabolic parameters. Our primary aim was to determine the impact of exercise training on reproductive health in women with PCOS. Our secondary aim was to determine the effect of exercise training on cardiometabolic indices. A systematic review of published literature was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE based on a pre-published protocol (PROSPERO CRD42017065324). The search was not limited by year. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials and uncontrolled trials that evaluated an exercise intervention in women with PCOS and reported reproductive outcomes were included. Reproductive outcomes were analysed semi-quantitatively and a meta-analysis was conducted for reported cardiometabolic outcomes. Of 517 screened abstracts, 14 studies involving 617 women with PCOS were included: seven randomized controlled trials, one non-randomized controlled trial and six uncontrolled trials. There were insufficient published data to describe the effect of exercise interventions on ovulation quantitatively, but semi-quantitative analysis suggested that exercise interventions may improve menstrual regularity, pregnancy and ovulation rates. Our meta-analysis found that exercise improved lipid profiles and decreased waist circumference, systolic blood pressure and fasting insulin. The impact of exercise interventions on reproductive function remains unclear. However, our meta-analysis suggests that exercise interventions may improve cardiometabolic profiles in women with PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cob.12258

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benham, J. L., Yamamoto, J. M., Friedenreich, C. M., Rabi, D. M., & Sigal, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Alberta Health Services (CA)
Corresponding author
Benham, J. L.
Venue
Clinical Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-06-12
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
275-284
ISSN
  • 1758-8103 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-8111
OpenAlex
W2808124122
Cited by
85
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alberta Health Services
  • University of Calgary
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, exercise training, reproductive outcomes, ovulation, menstrual cycle regularity, pregnancy, cardiometabolic outcomes, lipid profile, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting insulin
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Female, Heart, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Pregnancy, Reproduction, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review