Cited by 86Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Obsessive‐compulsive disorder in the DSM‐5.

Abramowitz, Jonathan S., Jacoby, Ryan J.·2014·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Abstract

Whereas the specific diagnostic criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have changed in only minor ways in the transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5, a more substantial change is that OCD is no longer classified as an anxiety disorder. Rather, it is now the flagship diagnosis of a new diagnostic category: the obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs). In this article, we describe the nature of obsessional problems as determined through empirical research before turning to a consideration of how OCD is defined in previous editions of the DSM and in DSM-5. We then critically consider the DSM criteria, as well as the basis for removing OCD from the anxiety disorders and creating the new OCRD category. Finally, we consider the implications of these changes for clinical practice and research on OCD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cpsp.12076

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The functional/causal relationship between obsessions and compulsions is not always clear; despite a traditional view that obsessions lead to compulsions, this may not always be the case.

    “The functional/causal relationship between obsessions and compulsions is not always clear—despite a traditional view that obsessions lead to compulsions, this may not always be the case (Abramowitz & Jacoby, 2014; Gillan et al., 2015; Gillan et al., 2016; Robbins et al., 2019).”

    From Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Etiology, neuropathology, and cognitive dysfunction (2023) · cites this paper as Abramowitz & Jacoby, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abramowitz, J. S., & Jacoby, R. J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2014-09
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
221-235
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W2097964544
Cited by
86
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, DSM-5, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, diagnostic classification, obsession, anxiety disorders, diagnostic criteria, clinical practice implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review