Cited by 1,819Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace recognition and analysis

The functional basis of face evaluation

Open access
Oosterhof, Nikolaas N., Todorov, Alexander·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

People automatically evaluate faces on multiple trait dimensions, and these evaluations predict important social outcomes, ranging from electoral success to sentencing decisions. Based on behavioral studies and computer modeling, we develop a 2D model of face evaluation. First, using a principal components analysis of trait judgments of emotionally neutral faces, we identify two orthogonal dimensions, valence and dominance, that are sufficient to describe face evaluation and show that these dimensions can be approximated by judgments of trustworthiness and dominance. Second, using a data-driven statistical model for face representation, we build and validate models for representing face trustworthiness and face dominance. Third, using these models, we show that, whereas valence evaluation is more sensitive to features resembling expressions signaling whether the person should be avoided or approached, dominance evaluation is more sensitive to features signaling physical strength/weakness. Fourth, we show that important social judgments, such as threat, can be reproduced as a function of the two orthogonal dimensions of valence and dominance. The findings suggest that face evaluation involves an overgeneralization of adaptive mechanisms for inferring harmful intentions and the ability to cause harm and can account for rapid, yet not necessarily accurate, judgments from faces.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0805664105

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trustworthiness judgements are a dominant mode of appraisal when encountering unfamiliar faces.

    “Trustworthiness judgements are a dominant mode of appraisal when encountering unfamiliar faces (Oosterhof & Todorov, 2008).”

    From Mistrust and negative self‐esteem: Two paths from attachment styles to paranoia. (2021) · cites this paper as Oosterhof & Todorov, 2008

  • The choice of using intelligence, trustworthiness, sociability and happiness as dependent attributes for the halo effect was driven by existing literature.

    “The choice of using intelligence, trustworthiness, sociability and happiness as dependent attributes for the halo effect was driven by existing literature on this cognitive bias, such as [4,6,8,9,22,53,60–63].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-08-12
Volume
105
Issue
32
Pages
11087-11092
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1971687303
Cited by
1,819
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 144 · 2022: 140 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 156 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 55
FWCI
17.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0446846)
  • Netherlands Organization for International Cooperation in Higher Education
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
face evaluation, facial expression perception, valence, dominance, trustworthiness, threat perception, social judgment, facial features
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Emotions, Face, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review