Cited by 94Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and TraumaEarly Childhood Education and Development

The long‐term effects of institutional rearing, foster care intervention and disruptions in care on brain electrical activity in adolescence

Open access
Debnath, Ranjan, Tang, Alva, Zeanah, Charles H., Nelson, Charles A., Fox, Nathan A.·2020·Developmental Science

Abstract

Exposure to early psychosocial deprivation as a result of institutional care disrupts typical brain development. The Bucharest Early Intervention Project (BEIP) is the first longitudinal study to investigate the neurodevelopment of institutionalized infants randomized to a foster care (FCG) intervention versus care as usual (CAUG). Here, we present findings from a follow‐up assessment of brain electrical activity as indexed by resting EEG at age 16 years. In addition, we examined the effects of disruption of foster care placement (e.g. the number of moves among foster care placements) on brain electrical activity. Resting‐state EEG was collected from 48 CAUG, 46 FCG and 48 never institutionalized (NIG) control participants. Absolute (µV 2 ) and relative (proportion) power were computed from eyes closed, resting EEG data for theta, alpha and beta frequency bands. The CAUG displayed higher relative theta and lower relative alpha power compared to the FCG at 16 years of age. The FCG showed brain activity comparable to the NIG. The results further showed that disruptions following the original foster care placement had an adverse effect on brain electrical activity. Within the foster care group, there were no effects of age of placement on EEG power. Placement of children who have experienced early institutional rearing into stable foster care settings ensure long‐term improvement in brain functioning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/desc.12872

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Foster care intervention in the BEIP is associated with EEG normalization of theta and alpha power and event-related potential responses to social and cognitive stimuli.

    “↑ EEG normalization of theta and alpha power, event-related potential responses to social and cognitive stimuli (Debnath et al., 2020(Debnath et al., , 2023;;McDermott et al., 2013;McLaughlin et al., 2011;Moulson et al., 2009;Vanderwert et al., 2016)”

    From Resilience following severe early life neglect: A review of longitudinal evidence from the Bucharest Early Intervention Project (2026) · cites this paper as Debnath et al., 2020

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that the foster-care group had lower theta and higher alpha power than the care-as-usual group, with EEG power comparable to never-institutionalized children. The Methods describe resting-state EEG measurement, not event-related potential responses to social or cognitive stimuli, so that part of the attributed claim is unsupported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Early factors (e.g., neural patterns, caregiving quality, placement stability, executive functioning) during childhood have been shown to later predict resilience outcomes (e.g., psychopathology, cognition) during adolescence.

    “Early factors (e.g., neural patterns, caregiving quality, placement stability, executive functioning) during childhood have been shown to later predict resilience outcomes (e.g., psychopathology, cognition) during adolescence (Debnath et al., 2020;Humphreys et al., 2015;McDermott et al., 2013;Sheridan et al., 2018).”

    From Resilience following severe early life neglect: A review of longitudinal evidence from the Bucharest Early Intervention Project (2026) · cites this paper as Debnath et al., 2020

    The Discussion reports that caregiving disruptions predicted internalizing and externalizing problems at age 12 in an earlier study, and this paper finds an association between placement disruptions and adolescent EEG activity. Its own adolescent outcome is brain activity, not psychopathology or cognition; it does not show that childhood neural patterns or executive functioning predict those outcomes. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among children who received the intervention, individual differences in the timing of placement into foster care between 6 and 33 months and in placement stability were associated with outcomes in several areas.

    “Consistent with previous analyses of discrete timepoints and domains (15-17, 19, 29), we found that, among children who received the intervention, individual differences in timing of placement into foster care between the ages of 6-33 months and the stability of this placement were associated with outcomes in several areas.”

    From A Comprehensive Multilevel Analysis of the Bucharest Early Intervention Project: Causal Effects on Recovery From Early Severe Deprivation (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction reports an association between earlier foster-care placement and greater alpha power at age 8, and the Results (Effect of disruption of placement) associate placement disruptions with EEG power at age 16. But the Results (Timing effects) find no association between placement age and EEG power at age 16. The copy also does not establish the specified 6–33-month range or show that both timing and stability were associated with outcomes across several areas. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Across EEG studies spanning early childhood through adolescence, foster care intervention has been shown to promote more normative neural development following early institutionalization.

    “Across electroencephalography (EEG) studies spanning early childhood through adolescence, foster care intervention has been shown to promote more normative neural development following early institutionalization (Debnath et al., 2020(Debnath et al., , 2023;;McDermott et al., 2013;McLaughlin et al., 2011;Moulson et al., 2009;Vanderwert et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Debnath, R., Tang, A., Zeanah, C. H., Nelson, C. A., & Fox, N. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Debnath, Ranjan
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-14
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
e12872-e12872
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2947063408
Cited by
94
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 14
FWCI
22.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Jacobs Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091363)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
institutional upbringing, foster care, brain development, resting-state EEG, brain electrical activity, Bucharest Early Intervention Project, theta power, alpha power, beta power, adolescence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Child, Institutionalized, Electroencephalography, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Psychosocial Deprivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review