The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Application of the 2010 revised criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis to patients with clinically isolated syndromes
Abstract
Background and purpose Recently, the McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) have been revised, with the aims to diagnose earlier and to simplify the use of brain MRI. To validate the 2010 revised criteria they were applied to a cohort of patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CIS). Methods In all, 178 CIS patients were followed from onset. Test characteristics were calculated after 1, 3 and 5 years and compared between the 2005 and 2010 revised criteria. The time to diagnosis of the 2005 and 2010 criteria was compared using survival analysis and the log-rank test. Clinical evidence for dissemination in space and time was the gold standard for clinically definite MS (CDMS). Results During follow-up, 76 patients converted to CDMS (mean time to conversion 23.9 months). At 1 year, the specificity and accuracy of the 2005 criteria were a little higher than those of the 2010 criteria (98.0% and 98.4% vs. 86.3% and 88.5%). However, at 5 years, differences completely disappeared (specificity 85.7% and accuracy 93.3% for both criteria). MS diagnosis could be made significantly faster with the 2010 criteria (P = 0.007). Using the 2010 criteria, in 19% of patients the diagnosis could already be made at baseline. Conclusions By applying the 2010 revised criteria a diagnosis of MS can be made earlier, whilst prediction of disease progression is maintained. This validation brings along great advantages, for treatment possibilities as well as patient counsellin…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Additional studies concerning the applicability of the 2010 McDonald Criteria in Asian, Middle Eastern, and Latin American populations have been published since 2010, though tended to be small.
“Additional studies concerning the applicability of the 2010 McDonald Criteria in Asian, 22-24 Middle Eastern, 25,26 and Latin American 27 populations have been published since 2010, though tended to be small.”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria (2018) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 10.1002/ana.410130302 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.178 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318205051d · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.1032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.20703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.22366 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jnnp.2010.208660 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb20235.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/brain/120.11.2059 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archneurol.2009.49 · DOI
- 10.1177/135245850100700603 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1352458510362996 · DOI
- Tintore M, 2000, Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21, 702
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70176-X · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.10240 · DOI
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000198253.35119.83 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jns.2007.08.030 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458511417828 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.22508 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70353-2 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458510369244 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria
Thompson, A. J., Banwell, B. L., Barkhof, F., Carroll, W. M., Coetzee, T., Comi, G., Correale, J., Fazekas, F., Filippi, M., Freedman, M. S., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30470-2 · Cited by 8,167
Metadata
- Authors
- Runia, T. F., Jafari, N., & Hintzen, R. Q.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Runia, T. F.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-07-30
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1510-1516
- ISSN
- 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-1331
- OpenAlex
- W2000589689
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Erasmus+
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, clinically isolated syndrome, early diagnosis, conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis, diagnostic accuracy, brain MRI, disease progression prediction
- MeSH terms
- Demyelinating Diseases, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Severity of Illness Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review