Cited by 22Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPolyomavirus and related diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Application of the 2010 revised criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis to patients with clinically isolated syndromes

Runia, T. F., Jafari, N., Hintzen, R. Q.·2013·European Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Background and purpose Recently, the McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) have been revised, with the aims to diagnose earlier and to simplify the use of brain MRI. To validate the 2010 revised criteria they were applied to a cohort of patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CIS). Methods In all, 178 CIS patients were followed from onset. Test characteristics were calculated after 1, 3 and 5 years and compared between the 2005 and 2010 revised criteria. The time to diagnosis of the 2005 and 2010 criteria was compared using survival analysis and the log-rank test. Clinical evidence for dissemination in space and time was the gold standard for clinically definite MS (CDMS). Results During follow-up, 76 patients converted to CDMS (mean time to conversion 23.9 months). At 1 year, the specificity and accuracy of the 2005 criteria were a little higher than those of the 2010 criteria (98.0% and 98.4% vs. 86.3% and 88.5%). However, at 5 years, differences completely disappeared (specificity 85.7% and accuracy 93.3% for both criteria). MS diagnosis could be made significantly faster with the 2010 criteria (P = 0.007). Using the 2010 criteria, in 19% of patients the diagnosis could already be made at baseline. Conclusions By applying the 2010 revised criteria a diagnosis of MS can be made earlier, whilst prediction of disease progression is maintained. This validation brings along great advantages, for treatment possibilities as well as patient counsellin…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ene.12243

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional studies concerning the applicability of the 2010 McDonald Criteria in Asian, Middle Eastern, and Latin American populations have been published since 2010, though tended to be small.

    “Additional studies concerning the applicability of the 2010 McDonald Criteria in Asian, 22-24 Middle Eastern, 25,26 and Latin American 27 populations have been published since 2010, though tended to be small.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1002/ana.410130302 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.178 · DOI
  3. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318205051d · DOI
  4. 10.1002/ana.1032 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/ana.20703 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/ana.22366 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1136/jnnp.2010.208660 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb20235.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/brain/120.11.2059 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1001/archneurol.2009.49 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/135245850100700603 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1177/1352458510362996 · DOI
  13. Tintore M, 2000, Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21, 702
  14. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70176-X · DOI
  15. 10.1002/ana.10240 · DOI
  16. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000198253.35119.83 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jns.2007.08.030 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/1352458511417828 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1002/ana.22508 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70353-2 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/1352458510369244 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Runia, T. F., Jafari, N., & Hintzen, R. Q.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Runia, T. F.
Venue
European Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-30
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
1510-1516
ISSN
  • 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1331
OpenAlex
W2000589689
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Erasmus+
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, clinically isolated syndrome, early diagnosis, conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis, diagnostic accuracy, brain MRI, disease progression prediction
MeSH terms
Demyelinating Diseases, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review