Cited by 37Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchVoice and Speech DisordersArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

A new diagnostic approach for the identification of patients with neurodegenerative cognitive complaints

Open access
Al-Hameed, Sabah, Benaissa, Mohammed, Christensen, Heidi, Mirheidari, Bahman, Blackburn, Daniel, Reuber, Markus·2019·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases causing dementia are known to affect a person's speech and language. Part of the expert assessment in memory clinics therefore routinely focuses on detecting such features. The current outpatient procedures examining patients' verbal and interactional abilities mainly focus on verbal recall, word fluency, and comprehension. By capturing neurodegeneration-associated characteristics in a person's voice, the incorporation of novel methods based on the automatic analysis of speech signals may give us more information about a person's ability to interact which could contribute to the diagnostic process. In this proof-of-principle study, we demonstrate that purely acoustic features, extracted from recordings of patients' answers to a neurologist's questions in a specialist memory clinic can support the initial distinction between patients presenting with cognitive concerns attributable to progressive neurodegenerative disorders (ND) or Functional Memory Disorder (FMD, i.e., subjective memory concerns unassociated with objective cognitive deficits or a risk of progression). The study involved 15 FMD and 15 ND patients where a total of 51 acoustic features were extracted from the recordings. Feature selection was used to identify the most discriminating features which were then used to train five different machine learning classifiers to differentiate between the FMD/ND classes, achieving a mean classification accuracy of 96.2%. The discriminative power of purely acoustic approaches could be integrated into diagnostic pathways for patients presenting with memory concerns and are computationally less demanding than methods focusing on linguistic elements of speech and language that require automatic speech recognition and understanding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0217388

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Alzheimer's disease, ASLA markers differentiate patients from healthy persons and other patient groups, predict overall cognitive status, outperform certain cognitive tests in predicting dementia onset, and correlate with volume of the hippocampus and other core atrophy regions.

    “In Alzheimer's disease, they differentiate patients from healthy persons 13,58-62 and other patient groups, 63 predict overall cognitive status, 64 outperform certain cognitive tests in predicting dementia onset, 65 and correlate with volume of the hippocampus and other core atrophy regions. 66,67”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Hameed, S., Benaissa, M., Christensen, H., Mirheidari, B., Blackburn, D., & Reuber, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Royal Hallamshire Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Al-Hameed, Sabah
  • Benaissa, Mohammed
  • Christensen, Heidi
  • Mirheidari, Bahman
  • Blackburn, Daniel
  • Reuber, Markus
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2019-05-24
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
e0217388
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945932771
Cited by
37
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0211-24079)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_14115)
  • Research for Patient Benefit Programme
  • NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
neurodegenerative diseases, dementia, subjective memory complaints, acoustic features, speech analysis, voice analysis, feature selection, machine learning classification, early detection of neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Proof of Concept Study, Aged, Dementia, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Sound Spectrography, Speech Acoustics, Video Recording, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review