Cited by 316Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsEpilepsy research and treatmentPain Management and Placebo Effect

Management of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Open access
LaFrance, W. Curt, Reuber, Markus, Goldstein, Laura H.·2013·Epilepsia

Abstract

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Neuropsychobiology Commission gave the charge to provide practical guidance for health professionals for the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). Using a consensus review of the literature, an international group of clinician-researchers in epilepsy, neurology, neuropsychology, and neuropsychiatry evaluated key management approaches for PNES. These included the following: presentation of the diagnosis, early phase treatment, psychological and pharmacologic interventions, and maintenance management. The aim of this report is to provide greater clarity about the range and current evidence base for treatment for patients with PNES, with the intention of improving the care of patients with PNES and patients who develop PNES as a comorbidity of epilepsy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/epi.12106

Cites

141 of 141 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The gold standard for PPS is documenting an attack with a home video recorder or with a tilt testing during which BP, HR, and EEG are normal.

    “The gold standard for PPS is documenting an attack with a home video recorder or with a tilt testing during which BP, HR, and EEG are normal.”
  • The gold standard for PNES is documenting an attack with video-EEG monitoring.

    “The gold standard for PNES is documenting an attack with video-EEG monitoring.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaFrance, W. C., Reuber, M., & Goldstein, L. H.
Affiliations
  • Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Neurology Division Rhode Island Hospital Brown University, Alpert Medical School Providence Rhode Island U.S.A
  • Royal Hallamshire Hospital (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03
Volume
54
Issue
s1
Pages
53-67
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2170302766
Cited by
316
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, pharmacotherapy, non-pharmacological treatment, psychological intervention, maintenance management, epilepsy comorbidity, treatment guidelines
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Communication, Electroencephalography, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Seizures, Somatoform Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review