Cited by 42

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

To eat, or NOt to eat: S ‐nitrosylation signaling in autophagy

Montagna, Costanza, Rizza, Salvatore, Maiani, Emiliano, Piredda, Lucia, Filomeni, Giuseppe, Cecconi, Francesco·2016·The FEBS Journal

Abstract

Autophagy is the main catabolic cellular process through which cells adapt their needs (e.g., growth and proliferation) to environmental availability of nutrients (e.g., amino acid and glucose) and growth factors. The rapid activation of the autophagy response essentially depends on protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs), which act as molecular switches triggering signaling cascades. Deregulation of autophagy contributes to pathological conditions, such as cancer and neurodegeneration. Therefore, understanding how PTMs affect the occurrence of autophagy is of the highest importance for clinical applications. Besides phosphorylation and ubiquitylation, which represent the best known examples of PTMs, redox‐based modifications are also emerging as contributing to the regulation of intracellular signaling. Of note, S ‐nitrosylation of cysteine residues is a redox PTM and is the principal mechanism of nitric oxide‐based signaling. Results emerging in recent years suggest that NO has a role in modulating autophagy. However, the function of S ‐nitrosylation in autophagy regulation remains still unveiled. By this review, we describe the upstream events regulating autophagy activation focusing on recently published evidence implying a S ‐nitrosylation‐dependent regulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/febs.13736

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 90

  1. 10.1038/nature06639 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1201940 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.023 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.15252/embr.201439076 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1242/jcs.103333 · DOI
  8. 10.4161/cc.25835 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00568-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/ncb840 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.007 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.055 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/ncb2152 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.016 · DOI
  16. 10.4161/auto.7.1.14071 · DOI
  17. 10.1083/jcb.201002100 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/ncb2708 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1074/jbc.M804723200 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80310-4 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.042 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.032 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.10.012 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nrm2764 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/ncb2114 · DOI
  28. 10.1126/science.1158265 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.002 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.1159246 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.08.012 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00131-X · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.1417816112 · DOI
  34. 10.1155/2014/428764 · DOI
  35. 10.1074/jbc.274.10.6519 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.024 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/carcin/bgr041 · DOI
  38. 10.1074/jbc.M304183200 · DOI
  39. 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14382 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.10.034 · DOI
  41. 10.1186/1750-1326-5-49 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1126/science.1171091 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1042/bj3190299 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.10.200 · DOI
  46. 10.1126/science.284.5414.651 · DOI
  47. 10.1073/pnas.0810595106 · DOI
  48. 10.1083/jcb.200104008 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00495-0 · DOI
  50. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000328 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.04.013 · DOI
  52. 10.1021/bi035275g · DOI
  53. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601253 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.029 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/jcb.25303 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/emboj.2009.364 · DOI
  57. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0588 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00506-2 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1002/ijc.21767 · DOI
  60. 10.1073/pnas.1307736110 · DOI
  61. 10.4161/auto.6.5.12509 · DOI
  62. 10.1126/science.1192912 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1016/j.abb.2008.10.034 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.02.012 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401244 · DOI
  66. 10.1089/ars.2010.3570 · DOI
  67. 10.1083/jcb.200802164 · DOI
  68. 10.1096/fj.09-136630 · DOI
  69. 10.1089/ars.2013.5696 · DOI
  70. 10.1083/jcb.200809125 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000298 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1083/jcb.201402104 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1038/nature13392 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1038/ncb2012 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1073/pnas.0404161101 · DOI
  76. 10.1126/science.1093891 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/srep02202 · DOI
  78. 10.1186/1750-1326-6-34 · DOI
  79. 10.1038/nature14893 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1016/j.mib.2013.03.010 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.05.022 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1152/ajpheart.01051.2008 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.024 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.006 · DOI
  85. 10.1038/ncb1723 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1038/nbt.1545 · DOI
  87. 10.1073/pnas.0508412103 · DOI
  88. 10.2174/156652412798376099 · DOI
  89. 10.1007/s12035-010-8113-9 · DOI
  90. 10.1016/j.mito.2010.04.007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Montagna, C., Rizza, S., Maiani, E., Piredda, L., Filomeni, G., & Cecconi, F.
Affiliations
  • Danish Cancer Society Research Center Copenhagen Denmark
  • Department of Biology University of Rome Tor Vergata Italy
Venue
The FEBS Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-05
Volume
283
Issue
21
Pages
3857-3869
ISSN
  • 1742-464X
  • 1742-4658
Cited by
42
References
11
Language
en
Funders
  • Kræftens Bekæmpelse (KBVU R72‐A4408, KBVU R72‐A4647)
  • Lundbeckfonden (R167‐2013‐16100, R52‐A4895)
  • Novo Nordisk (7559)
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (11452, IG2012)
  • Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla
  • Fondazione Telethon (GGP14202)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review