CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,364Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR)

Paul, Justin, Lim, Weng Marc, O’Cass, Aron, Hao, Andy Wei, Bresciani, Stefano·2021·International Journal of Consumer Studies
DOI 10.1111/ijcs.12695
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Many guiding articles on literature reviews exist, but few have delivered an authoritative protocol that researchers can rely upon with clarity and confidence. To commemorate the inaugural annual special issue on systematic literature reviews in the International Journal of Consumer Studies , the editors have pooled their expertize and experience of authoring, editing, and reviewing literature reviews to develop a rigorous review protocol—that is, the Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews ( SPAR‐4‐SLR ) protocol—that researchers can rely upon to guide and justify decisions in systematic literature reviews. Using an interrogative approach, the editors begin with a discussion of the “what,” “why,” “when,” “where,” “who,” and “how” of systematic literature reviews. The editors conclude with systematic literature review exemplars in the inaugural special issue.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijcs.12695

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 87 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,004

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode (IN)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • University of Hartford (US)
  • University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Lim, Weng Marc
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-12
Volume
45
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1470-6423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-6431
DOI
10.1111/ijcs.12695
OpenAlex
W3154271163
Cited by
2,364
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 654 · 2025: 642 · 2024: 530 · 2023: 333 · 2022: 162 · 2021: 41
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2021-08-04)
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • International Journal of Consumer Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
systematic reviews, research methodology, consumer research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review