The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of pressurised liquid extraction and solid–liquid extraction methods on the phenolic content and antioxidant activities of Irish macroalgae
Abstract
Summary The efficiencies of pressurised liquid extraction (PLE) and a traditional solid–liquid extraction (SLE) at extracting antioxidant polyphenols from Irish macroalgae Ascophyllum nodosum, Pelvetia canaliculata, Fucus spiralis and Ulva intestinalis were compared. PLE was more effective for extracting polyphenols with acetone/water (80:20); however, when food‐friendly solvents of ethanol/water (80:20) and water were employed, SLE resulted in higher phenolic content in brown macroalgal extracts. For example, the Fucus spiralis SLE water and ethanol/water extracts displayed total phenolic contents (TPCs) of 130.58 ± 2.78 and 142.81 ± 1.77 μg phloroglucinol equivalents (PGE) mg−1 sample, respectively, compared with TPCs of 90.79 ± 1.16 and 124 ± 6.54 μg PGE mg−1 sample for the corresponding PLE extracts. All SLE aqueous ethanolic macroalgal extracts possessed higher DPPH radical scavenging abilities (RSA) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) than their PLE equivalents. This study indicates that the application of high extraction temperatures (50–200 °C) and pressures (500–3000 psi) used in PLE does not enhance the antioxidant activities of macroalgal extracts relative to SLE extraction. The ability to produce antioxidant food‐friendly macroalgal extracts using SLE could represent significant cost reductions on an industrial scale further enhancing the potential of macroalgal polyphenols to be used in functional food preparations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While Tierney et al. [66] in their research showed that the extracts obtained with conventional method contained higher concentration of extracted polyphenols compared with SWE extracts, Vo Dinh et al. [67] obtained the opposite results.”
From Overview on the Application of Modern Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae (2018) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity
Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., & Berset, C. (1995) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0023-6438(95)80008-5 · Cited by 25,994
Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R., & Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. (1999) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99017-1 · Cited by 19,125
Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease
Valko, M., Leibfritz, D., Moncol, J., Cronin, M. T. D., Mazur, M., & Telser, J. (2007) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001 · Cited by 14,269
Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids
Rice-Evans, C. A., Miller, N. J., & Paganga, G. (1996) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9 · Cited by 9,085
Thaipong, K., Boonprakob, U., Crosby, K. M., Cisneros‐Zevallos, L., & Byrne, D. (2006) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2006.01.003 · Cited by 3,768
Dudonné, S., Vitrac, X., Coutière, P., Woillez, M., & Mérillon, J. (2009) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf803011r · Cited by 1,911
Role of ferritin as a lipid oxidation catalyst in muscle food
Decker, E. A., & Welch, B. (1990) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf00093a019 · Cited by 1,249
Sultana, B., Anwar, F., & Ashraf, M. (2009) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules14062167 · Cited by 1,240
Accelerated Solvent Extraction: A Technique for Sample Preparation
Richter, B. E., Jones, B. A., Ezzell, J. L., Porter, N. L., Avdalović, N., & Pohl, C. A. (1996) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac9508199 · Cited by 1,234
Türkmen, N., Sarı, F., & Velioğlu, Y. S. (2005) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.08.034 · Cited by 779
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2012 International Conference on Food Safety Quality and Nutrition (ICFSQN) Manchester UK G. Rajauria A.K. Jaiswal N. Abu‐Ghannam Effect of solvents on the extractability of phenolic constituents and their antioxidant capacity from Irish seaweed 202 206
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algae as Production Systems of Bioactive Compounds
Michalak, I., & Chojnacka, K. (2015) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.201400191 · Cited by 576
“spiralis Ulva intestinalis SLE and PLE was employed to extract algae with 100% water, ethanol/water (80:20, v:v), and acetone/water (80:20, v:v) DPPH Ferric reducing antioxidant power Ferrous ion chelating capability assay [16]”
BackgroundMethodMekinić, I. G., Skroza, D., Šimat, V., Hamed, I., Čagalj, M., & Perković, Z. P. (2019) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom9060244 · Cited by 314
“[56] reported that the use of ACE as extraction solvent gave the highest total yield of extracted phenolics probably due to inhibiting interactions between tannins and proteins during extraction or even by breaking hydrogen bonds between tannin-protein complexes [27].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAlgal extracts: Technology and advances
Michalak, I., & Chojnacka, K. (2014) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.201400139 · Cited by 289
“Short-chain fatty acids Haematococcus pluvialis (MI) [85] Fucoxanthin Eisenia bicyclis (MA) [86] Phenols Ascophyllum nodosum, Pelvetia canaliculata, Fucus spiralis, Ulva intestinalis (MA) [87]”
BackgroundGarcía‐Vaquero, M., Ummat, V., Tiwari, B. K., & Rajauria, G. (2020) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md18030172 · Cited by 243
“, species, season and location of harvesting) [19] and the extraction procedures and purification conditions used [4,20].”
MethodCikoš, A.-M., Jokić, S., Šubarić, D., & Jerković, I. (2018) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md16100348 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Tierney, M. S., Smyth, T. J., Hayes, M., Soler‐Vila, A., Croft, A. K., & Brunton, N.
- Affiliations
- Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
- Food Biosciences Department Teagasc Food Research Centre Ashtown Dublin 15 Ireland
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- Bangor University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Tierney, Michelle S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-12-03
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 860-869
- ISSN
- 0950-5423 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2621
- OpenAlex
- W1987997155
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
- Keywords
- accelerated solvent extraction, solid-liquid extraction, seaweed, polyphenols, antioxidant activity, Ascophyllum nodosum, Pelvetia canaliculata, Fucus spiralis, Ulva intestinalis, extraction solvents, extraction pressure and temperature, DPPH radical scavenging, ferric reducing antioxidant power, functional foods, brown algae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
