Cited by 66Seaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsAlgal biology and biofuel productionFood Science and Nutritional Studies

Investigation of nutraceutical potential of the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis

Matos, Joana, Cardoso, Carlos L., Falé, Pedro, Afonso, Cláudia M., Bandarra, Narcisa M.·2020·International Journal of Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Summary The microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis were evaluated as nutraceuticals. It was observed that Arthrospira platensis is richer in saturated fatty acids (FA) and Chlorella vulgaris richer in monounsaturated FA. Within polyunsaturated FA (PUFA), n3 PUFA content was below 1% in Arthrospira sp and over 10% in Chlorella vulgaris. This microalga had the lowest polyphenolic content. The highest value was found in the aqueous extract of Arthrospira platensis, 334 ± 32 mg GAE per 100 g dw. Regarding DPPH, only aqueous extracts of Chlorella vulgaris yielded antioxidant activity with an inhibitory activity of 80 ± 1%. ABTS results showed stronger inhibition through the aqueous extracts than through the ethanolic extracts, 89%–93% vs. 24%–32%. Concerning cytotoxicity, ethanolic extracts of Chlorella vulgaris induced a cell viability decrease of approximately 80%. The biochemical characterisation and bioactivity assessment of Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis showed that these microalgae have potential for nutraceutical applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijfs.14278

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matos, J., Cardoso, C. L., Falé, P., Afonso, C. M., & Bandarra, N. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa Campo Grande, 16 Lisbon 1749‐016 Portugal
Corresponding author
Cardoso, Carlos L.
Venue
International Journal of Food Science & Technology
Published
2019-07-07
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
303-312
ISSN
  • 0950-5423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2621
OpenAlex
W2953611978
Cited by
66
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/102689/2014)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food Science and Nutritional Studies
Keywords
Chlorella vulgaris, Spirulina platensis, microalgae, nutraceuticals, fatty acid composition, polyunsaturated fatty acids, polyphenols, antioxidant activity, cytotoxicity, cell viability, aqueous extract, ethanol extract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review