Cited by 504Epilepsy research and treatmentNeurological disorders and treatmentsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Clinical manifestations of insular lobe seizures: a stereo-electroencephalographic study

Open access
Isnard, Jean, Guénot, Marc, Sindou, Marc, Mauguière, François·2004·Epilepsia

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, we report the clinical features of insular lobe seizures based on data from video and stereo-electroencephalographic (SEEG) ictal recordings and direct electric insular stimulation of the insular cortex performed in patients referred for presurgical evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). METHODS: Since our first recordings of insular seizures, the insular cortex has been included as one of the targets of stereo-electroencephalographic (SEEG) electrode implantation in 50 consecutive patients with TLE whose seizures were suspected to originate from, or rapidly to propagate to, the perisylvian cortex. In six, a stereotyped sequence of ictal symptoms associated with intrainsular discharges could be identified. RESULTS: This ictal sequence occurred in full consciousness, beginning with a sensation of laryngeal constriction and paresthesiae, often unpleasant, affecting large cutaneous territories, most often at the onset of a complex partial seizure (five of the six patients). It was eventually followed by dysarthric speech and focal motor convulsive symptoms. The insular origin of these symptoms was supported by the data from functional cortical mapping of the insula by using direct cortical stimulations. CONCLUSIONS: This sequence of ictal symptoms looks reliable enough to characterize insular lobe epileptic seizures (ILESs). Observation of this clinical sequence at the onset of seizures on video-EEG recordings in TLE patients strongly suggests that the seizure-onset zone is located not in the temporal but in the insular lobe; recording directly from the insular cortex should occur before making any decision regarding epilepsy surgery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.68903.x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The highest prevalence of bodily self disturbances was found in the parietal cortex (primary somatosensory cortex: 27.3%) and temporo-insular cortex (24%), whereas the lowest prevalence was found for early whole-brain or temporal cortex mapping by Penfield and colleagues (0.1%−1.8%).

    “The highest prevalence was found in the parietal cortex (primary somatosensory cortex: 27.3%; Sun, Zhang, Yu, et al., 2021) and temporo‐insular cortex (24%; Isnard et al., 2004), whereas the lowest prevalence was found for early whole‐brain or temporal cortex mapping by Penfield and colleagues (0.1%−1.8%; Penfield & Perot, 1963; Penfield, 1947, 1955, 1957).”

    From Neural bases of the bodily self as revealed by electrical brain stimulation: A systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as Isnard et al., 2004

    The Somatosensory responses section reports insular-stimulation responses involving whole-body sensations and feelings of unreality, so the paper supports an association with bodily-self disturbances. It does not report a 24% prevalence for the temporo-insular cortex; it lists each of those response types as 4% of evoked responses. The parietal and Penfield figures are attached to other citations, not Isnard et al. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies of epileptic seizures in the insula, stroke-induced lesions to the insula, lesioning studies in rats, and direct electrical stimulation studies in primates have shown the insula is critical for perception, recognition, and working memory in taste.

    “Studies of epileptic seizures in the insula (Isnard et al., 2004), stroke-induced lesions to the insula (Pritchard et al., 1999), lesioning studies in rats (DeCoteau et al., 1997; Ragozzino and Kesner, 1999; Fresquet et al., 2004), and direct electrical stimulation studies in primates (Verhagen et al., 2004) have shown the insula is critical for perception, recognition, and working memory in taste”

    From The Insula: A Brain Stimulation Target for the Treatment of Addiction (2019) · cites this paper as Isnard et al., 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Guillaume MMJ, Mazars G. Technique de résection de l'insula dans les épilepsies insulaires. Rev Neurol 1949;81:900-3.
  2. Guillaume MMJ, Mazars G, Mazars Y. Indications chirurgicales dans les épilepsies dites "temporalis." Rev Neurol 1953;88:461-501.
  3. Isnard J, Guenot M, Ostrowsky K, et al. The role of the insular cortex in temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol 2000;48:614-23.
  4. Williamson D, Engel J, Munari C. Anatomic classification of localization-related epilepsy. In: Engel J, Pedley T, eds. Epilepsy. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:2405-26.
  5. Prats JM, Garaizar C, Garcia-Nieto ML, et al. Opercular epileptic syndrome: an unusual form of benign partial epilepsy in childhood. Rev Neurol 1999;29:375-80.
  6. Kahane P, Tassi L, Francione S, et al. Electroclinical manifestations elicited by intracerebral electric stimulation "shocks" in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurophysiol Clin 1993;23:305-26.
  7. Engel J, Williamson PD, Wieser HG. Mesial temporal lobe epilep- sies. In: Engel J, Pedley, eds. Epilepsy. Philadelphia: Lippincott- Raven, 1997:2417-26.
  8. Doyle WK, Spencer DD. Anterior temporal résections. In: Engel J, Pedley, eds. Epilepsy. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:1807- 17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Isnard, J., Guénot, M., Sindou, M., & Mauguière, F.
Affiliations
Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-24
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
1079-1090
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2052579703
Cited by
504
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 28
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
temporal lobe epilepsy, stereoelectroencephalography, seizure onset zone, direct cortical stimulation, insula, complex partial seizures, dysarthric speech, laryngeal constriction, preoperative assessment, epilepsy surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Diagnosis, Differential, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Neural Pathways, Preoperative Care, Seizures, Stereotaxic Techniques, Temporal Lobe, Video Recording, Treatment Outcome, Epilepsy, Rolandic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review