Cited by 400Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Music Perception

Contributions of the insula to cognition and emotion

Gasquoine, Philip Gerard·2014·Neuropsychology Review

Abstract

Historically, the insula was considered primary gustatory cortex. Now it is known to play a more comprehensive role in the processing of sensory information, including acting as primary cortex for interoceptive information, including autonomic nervous system mediated changes. As such, it is critical for emotional feeling in accord with the James-Lange theory, a role previously ascribed to the limbic system. Neuroimaged abnormal grey matter volumes or activity levels in the insula have been associated with schizophrenia, eating disorders, anxiety and mood disorders, conduct disorder, autism, addiction, and chronic pain. The significance of these abnormal activity patterns remains theoretical. Neuropsychological studies have linked dominant insula injury with various symptoms of aphasia, but its exact role in language processing remains uncertain as most cases involve lesions that extend into perisylvian language zones. Functional neuroimaging studies have found insula hyper-activations, typically in conjunction with anterior cingulate cortex, for all manner of experimental tasks including those involving perception, intentional action, and consciousness. Such neuroimaged activity is unlikely to be task-specific, but rather reflective of generic changes in autonomic activity in response to salience, homeostatic incongruence, or cognitive challenge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11065-014-9246-9

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insula cortex is critical for integration of interoceptive and sensory information and regulating emotional response.

    “Insula cortex is critical for integration of interoceptive and sensory information and regulating emotional response (Gasquoine, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gasquoine, P. G.
Affiliations
The University of Texas System (US)
Corresponding author
Gasquoine, Philip Gerard
Venue
Neuropsychology Review
Published
2014-01-18
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
77-87
ISSN
  • 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6660
OpenAlex
W1989986125
Cited by
400
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
insula, interoception, emotions, James-Lange theory, autonomic nervous system, schizophrenia, eating disorders, mood and anxiety disorders, autism spectrum disorder, addiction, chronic pain, aphasia, language processing, anterior cingulate cortex, salience, consciousness, cognitive challenge
MeSH terms
Animals, Autonomic Nervous System, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Emotions, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review