Cited by 116Language and cultural evolutionParasite Biology and Host InteractionsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

A parasite‐driven wedge: infectious diseases may explain language and other biodiversity

Fincher, Corey L., Thornhill, Randy·2008·Oikos

Abstract

Parasite–host coevolutionary races are spatially variable across species’ or human cultural ranges. Assortative sociality, biased toward local conspecifics, and limited dispersal (philopatry) in humans and other organisms can be adaptive through reduced contact with dangerous contagions harbored by distant/non‐local conspecifics. These factors can generate cultural or population divergence. Thus, parasites are like a wedge driving groups apart through their effective creation of anticontagion behaviors. If this proposition is correct, then biological diversity should positively correlate with parasite diversity. Here we show that the worldwide distribution of indigenous human language diversity, a form of biodiversity, is strongly, positively related to human parasite diversity indicative of a legacy of parasite‐mediated diversification. The significant pattern remains when potential confounds are removed. The pattern too is seen in each of the six world regions and is not confounded by regional differences in their history of colonization and conquest. We hypothesize that variation in limited dispersal and assortative sociality with conspecifics in response to the worldwide spatial variation in pathogen diversity provides a fundamental mechanism of population divergence explaining many important aspects of the geographic patterns of biodiversity. This hypothesis has broad implications for a diversity of research topics including language diversity, cultural evolution, speciation, phylogeny and biogeography.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16684.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08-13
Volume
117
Issue
9
Pages
1289-1297
ISSN
  • 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0706
OpenAlex
W2101286439
Cited by
116
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
136.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oikos (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
host-parasite coevolution, infectious diseases, linguistic diversity, biodiversity, parasite diversity, philopatry, dispersal limitation, population divergence, cultural evolution, speciation, biogeography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review