Cited by 190Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

Ironic Effects of Racial Bias During Interracial Interactions

Shelton, J. Nicole, Richeson, Jennifer A., Salvatore, Jessica, Trawalter, Sophie·2005·Psychological Science

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that Blacks like White interaction partners who make an effort to appear unbiased more than those who do not. We tested the hypothesis that, ironically, Blacks perceive White interaction partners who are more racially biased more positively than less biased White partners, primarily because the former group must make more of an effort to control racial bias than the latter. White participants in this study completed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) as a measure of racial bias and then discussed race relations with either a White or a Black partner. Whites' IAT scores predicted how positively they were perceived by Black (but not White) interaction partners, and this relationship was mediated by Blacks' perceptions of how engaged the White participants were during the interaction. We discuss implications of the finding that Blacks may, ironically, prefer to interact with highly racially biased Whites, at least in short interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01547.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suppressing stereotypes requires effort, which can deplete cognitive resources and adversely affect the ability to solve problems and make correct decisions.

    “In addition, suppressing stereotypes requires effort,65 which can deplete cognitive resources and adversely affect the ability to solve problems and make correct decisions.66”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., Salvatore, J., & Trawalter, S.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2005-05
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
397-402
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2166799601
Cited by
190
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
35.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
racial bias, interracial interaction, perceived bias, implicit racial attitudes, Implicit Association Test, interracial friendship, black-white relations, mate preferences, perceived engagement, ironic effects
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Prejudice, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review