Cited by 881Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsCognitive Science and Education Research

How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought

Open access
Clore, Gerald L., Huntsinger, Jeffrey R.·2007·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Being happy or sad influences the content and style of thought. One explanation is that affect serves as information about the value of whatever comes to mind. Thus, when a person makes evaluative judgments or engages in a task, positive affect can enhance evaluations and empower potential responses. Rather than affect itself, the information conveyed by affect is crucial. Tests of the hypothesis find that affective influences can be made to disappear by changing the source to which the affect is attributed. In tasks, positive affect validates and negative affect invalidates accessible cognitions, leading to relational processing and item-specific processing, respectively. Positive affect is found to promote, and negative affect to inhibit, many textbook phenomena from cognitive psychology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.005

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Clore, Gerald L.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
393-399
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984901331
Cited by
881
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 58
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-50074, R01MH050074)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
emotion and cognition, positive affect, negative affect, emotional information, evaluative judgments, cognitive inhibition, relational processing, item-specific processing, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Affect, Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Judgment, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review