Cited by 235Behavioral Health and InterventionsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionDigital Mental Health Interventions

Digital Behaviour Change Interventions to Break and Form Habits

Open access
Pinder, Charlie, Vermeulen, Jo, Cowan, Benjamin R., Beale, Russell·2018·ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Abstract

Digital behaviour change interventions, particularly those using pervasive computing technology, hold great promise in supporting users to change their behaviour. However, most interventions fail to take habitual behaviour into account, limiting their potential impact. This failure is partly driven by a plethora of overlapping behaviour change theories and related strategies that do not consider the role of habits. We critically review the main theories and models used in the research to analyse their application to designing effective habitual behaviour change interventions. We highlight the potential for Dual Process Theory, modern habit theory, and Goal Setting Theory, which together model how users form and break habits, to drive effective digital interventions. We synthesise these theories into an explanatory framework, the Habit Alteration Model, and use it to outline the state of the art. We identify the opportunities and challenges of habit-focused interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3196830

Cites

396 of 396 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 398 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinder, C., Vermeulen, J., Cowan, B. R., & Beale, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Published
2018-06-12
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
1-66
ISSN
  • 1073-0516 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7325
OpenAlex
W2808257344
Cited by
235
References
398
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12
FWCI
20.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
digital behaviour change interventions, habit formation, habit breaking, habitual behavior, dual-process theory, goal setting theory, ubiquitous computing, behaviour change theory, intervention design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review