Cited by 80Diabetes Management and EducationChronic Disease Management StrategiesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The efficacy of tailored interventions for self‐management outcomes of type 2 diabetes, hypertension or heart disease: a systematic review

Radhakrishnan, Kavita·2012·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

radhakrishnan k. (2012) The efficacy of tailored interventions for self‐management outcomes of type 2 diabetes, hypertension or heart disease: a systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing68(3), 496–510. Aim. To evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of tailored interventions on self‐management behaviours in individuals with heart disease, hypertension or type 2 diabetes. Background. Tailored interventions are designed for individuals based on their unique characteristics, related to the outcome of interest, and derived from an individual assessment. Recognizing the differences between individuals and delivering interventions tailored to the individual could increase the likelihood of sustained self‐management of long‐term conditions. Review methods. A review of randomized controlled trials published between 2001 and 2010 was undertaken using the following databases: Pubmed, WOS, CINAHL, ERIC, ASP, PsychInfo and SSA. The search terms included tailored intervention(s), and self‐management of chronic diseases included in the aim. Reference lists from relevant articles were also examined for additional references. Results. Ten studies were included in the review. Tailored interventions had no impact on self‐management activities such as medication adherence, self‐monitoring, exercise, smoking, or diet control. However, tailored interventions were modestly successful in improving specific self‐management behaviours of dietary fat intake, levels of physical activity or screening. Studies included in the review generally suffered from compromised methodological issues of inadequately powered sample size, non‐blinding of data collection or intervention delivery and inadequate reporting of the randomization process. Conclusion. When cost and resource utilization is taken into consideration, tailored interventions may not be more effective than standard interventions in improving self‐management behaviours in individuals with long‐term conditions. Future research should explore the effect of robust and resource‐optimized tailored interventions on self‐management outcomes for long‐term conditions with high‐quality trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05860.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radhakrishnan examined 10 studies and showed that, after accounting for cost and resource utilization, the efficacy of tailored interventions may not exceed that of standard interventions in the improvement of disease self-management.

    “Radhakrishnan32 examined 10 studies and showed that, after accounting for cost and resource utilization, the efficacy of tailored interventions may not exceed that of standard interventions in the improvement of disease self-management.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radhakrishnan, K.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Radhakrishnan, Kavita
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-20
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
496-510
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W1540446354
Cited by
80
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
personalized interventions, self-management, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, chronic disease, medication adherence, self-monitoring, physical activity, dietary fat intake, screening, methodological quality of trials
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Heart Diseases, Humans, Hypertension, Patient Care Planning, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Health Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review