Cited by 131Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsNutritional Studies and Diet

A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Online Interventions to Improve Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Open access
Alexander, Gwen L., McClure, Jennifer B., Calvi, Josephine H., Divine, George W., Stopponi, Melanie A., Rolnick, Sharon J., Heimendinger, Jerianne, Tolsma, Dennis D. +5 more·2010·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We assessed change in fruit and vegetable intake in a population-based sample, comparing an online untailored program (arm 1) with a tailored behavioral intervention (arm 2) and with a tailored behavioral intervention plus motivational interviewing–based counseling via e-mail (arm 3). Methods. We conducted a randomized controlled intervention trial, enrolling members aged 21 to 65 years from 5 health plans in Seattle, Washington; Denver, Colorado; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Detroit, Michigan; and Atlanta, Georgia. Participants reported fruit and vegetable intake at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. We assessed mean change in fruit and vegetable servings per day at 12 months after baseline, using a validated self-report fruit and vegetable food frequency questionnaire. Results. Of 2540 trial participants, 80% were followed up at 12 months. Overall baseline mean fruit and vegetable intake was 4.4 servings per day. Average servings increased by more than 2 servings across all study arms (P < .001), with the greatest increase (+2.8 servings) among participants of arm 3 (P = .05, compared with control). Overall program satisfaction was high. Conclusions. This online nutritional intervention was well received, convenient, easy to disseminate, and associated with sustained dietary change. Such programs have promise as population-based dietary interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2008.154468

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Logins were found to be positively associated with outcome in studies targeting food and vegetable consumption, physical activity, and weight management.

    “Using the previously described rating system, logins were found to be positively associated with outcome in studies targeting food and vegetable consumption [32], physical activity [33-37], and weight management [38-40].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander, G. L., McClure, J. B., Calvi, J. H., Divine, G. W., Stopponi, M. A., Rolnick, S. J., Heimendinger, J., Tolsma, D. D., Resnicow, K., Campbell, M. K., Strecher, V. J., Johnson, C. C., & for the MENU Choices Team
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Gwen L. Alexander, George W. Divine, and Christine Cole Johnson are with the Department of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Hospital and Health System, Detroit, MI. Jennifer B. McClure is with Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA. Josephine H. Calvi and Dennis D. Tolsma are with the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta. Melanie A. Stopponi is with the Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver. Sharon J. Rolnick is with...
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2010-02
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
319-326
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2099955616
Cited by
131
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (U19CA079689)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK056350)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
fruit and vegetable intake, motivational interviewing, email counseling, health insurance beneficiaries, program satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Counseling, Feeding Behavior, Female, Fruit, Health Promotion, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, United States, Vegetables, Logistic Models, Statistics, Nonparametric, Internet, Electronic Mail, Consumer Health Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review