Cited by 70Cancer survivorship and careMental Health via WritingArt Therapy and Mental Health

Expressive writing in early breast cancer survivors

Craft, Melissa A., Davis, Gail C., Paulson, René M.·2013·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

AIMS: This article is the report of a study aimed at determining whether or not expressive writing improves the quality-of-life of early breast cancer survivors. An additional aim is the investigation of whether or not the type of writing prompt makes a difference in results. BACKGROUND: The risk of distress can extend well beyond the time of a breast cancer diagnosis. Emotional expression may assist in dealing with this. DESIGN: Randomized controlled study. METHODS: Participants (n = 120) were randomized into one of four groups: a control group (no writing) or one of three expressive writing groups: breast cancer trauma, any self-selected trauma and facts related to breast cancer. Participants wrote 20 minutes a day for 4 consecutive days. Their quality-of-life was measured, using the 'Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Version', at baseline and at 1 month and 6 months after writing. Paired t-tests, multivariate analysis of variance and multiple regression were used to analyse the data of the 97 participants who completed the journaling assignment and at least the first assessment, collected in 2006. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. RESULTS/FINDINGS: Expressive writing about one's breast cancer, breast cancer trauma and facts related to breast cancer, significantly improved the quality-of-life outcome. CONCLUSION: Expressive writing, focusing the instructions on writing about one's living and dealing with a diagnosis of breast cancer, is recommended for early breast cancer survivors as a feasible and easily implemented treatment approach to improve quality-of-life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06008.x

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craft, M. A., Davis, G. C., & Paulson, R. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Texas Woman's University (US)
Corresponding author
Craft, Melissa A.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-11
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
305-315
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W1929064821
Cited by
70
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
expressive writing, quality of life, writing prompts, emotional expression, psychological distress
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Breast Neoplasms, Emotions, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Writing, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review