The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex Differences in Social Investigation: Effects of Androgen Receptors, Hormones and Test Partner
Open accessAbstract
We examined the role of the androgen receptor (AR) in the investigatory behaviour of conspecifics using mice carrying the testicular feminisation mutation (X Tfm Y). Responses to members of the same and opposite sex were evaluated in a habituation/dishabituation task. Adult mice were gonadectomised and treated with oestradiol (E 2) or testosterone. After E 2 treatment, regardless of the sex of the stimulus mouse, wild‐type (WT) males engaged in significantly more investigation than WT females. X Tfm Y males treated with E 2 showed ‘male‐like’ behaviour in response to a male but behaved ‘female‐like’ when the stimulus was a female. Because WT and X Tfm Y males behaved the same in response to another male, we used two additional mouse models to ask whether sex chromosomes were responsible for this phenomenon. Regardless of sex chromosome complement, gonadal males displayed high levels of investigation. When mice were treated with testosterone, investigation by WT females was enhanced, which eliminated the sex differences. Most strikingly, X Tfm Y males receiving testosterone‐treatment increased the investigation of females to levels equal to those shown by WT mice. Given that testosterone, but not its metabolite E 2, caused X Tfm Y males to investigate female conspecifics at high levels, it is plausible that nonclassical actions of AR, and/or activation of a novel AR, may be involved in this behaviour. Taken together, our data show that AR activation during adulthood is not required for males to investigate mice of either sex. However, ‘male‐like’ levels of investigation of a female stimulus may depend on neonatal activation of the classic nuclear AR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a recent study, elevated social investigation was seen in males when comparing estrogen-treated males and females, exploring either GDX female or male conspecifics.
“In a recent study, elevated social investigation was seen in males when comparing estrogen-treated males and females, exploring either GDX female or male conspecifics.”
From Effects of sex and gonadectomy on social investigation and social recognition in mice (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
The Results sections on female and male conspecifics report greater investigation by E2-treated WT males than WT females. However, Materials and methods > Stimulus animals specifies that the female stimuli were ovariectomised while the male stimuli were gonad-intact; it does not support describing both as GDX. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTestosterone has been suggested to be involved in sex differences in the duration of social investigation.
“testosterone has been suggested to be involved [15–17]”
From Effects of sex and gonadectomy on social investigation and social recognition in mice (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
In that recent study, no sex differences were seen when all test animals were treated with testosterone, possibly due to an increased sociability in the female group.
“No sex differences were however seen when all test animals were treated with testosterone—possibly due to an increased sociability in the female group [17].”
From Effects of sex and gonadectomy on social investigation and social recognition in mice (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
In mice, exogenous testosterone was recently shown to increase social investigatory behaviour.
“Also in mice, exogenous testosterone was recently shown to increase social investigatory behaviour [17].”
From Effects of sex and gonadectomy on social investigation and social recognition in mice (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychological outcomes and gender-related development in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome
Hines, M., Ahmed, S. F., & Hughes, I. A. (2003) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1022492106974 · Cited by 320
Handa, R. J., Pak, T. R., Kudwa, A. E., Lund, T. D., & Hinds, L. (2008) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.012 · Cited by 205
Yarbrough, W. G., Quarmby, V. E., Simental, J. A., Joseph, D. R., Sar, M., Lubahn, D. B., Olsen, K. L., French, F. S., & Wilson, E. M. (1990) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)38972-0 · Cited by 199
A previously uncharacterized role for estrogen receptor β: Defeminization of male brain and behavior
Kudwa, A. E., Bodo, C., Gustafsson, J.-Å., & Rissman, E. F. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0500752102 · Cited by 135
Self-citationHalem, H. A., Baum, M. J., & Cherry, J. A. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-07-02474.2001 · Cited by 108
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 10.1210/endo-106-1-306 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-4731(88)90351-2 · DOI
- Goy RW, 1980, Sexual Differentiation of the Brain
- 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.08.008 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05484.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2000.00418.x · DOI
- 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1805 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2007.01540.x · DOI
- 10.1210/en.2008-0183 · DOI
- Olsen KL, 1992, Sexual Differentiation: Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, 1
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3743-05.2006 · DOI
- 10.1159/000133152 · DOI
- 10.1006/hbeh.1997.1419 · DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7044.117.1.38 · DOI
- 10.1006/frne.2002.0229 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.01.007 · DOI
- 10.1210/en.141.9.3111 · DOI
- 10.1210/endo-124-2-771 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2004.00036.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.08.004 · DOI
- 10.1124/jpet.110.169854 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.10.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1210/endo-121-6-2205 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1979.tb07861.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0091-3057(98)00005-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00224-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.06.020 · DOI
- 10.1093/alcalc/agp061 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07881.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90370-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91613-L · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/ajpendo.00085.2010 · DOI
- 10.1016/0306-4530(93)90028-J · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6965 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0361-9230(92)90162-Q · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90073-K · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0166-4328(90)90042-D · DOI
- 10.1006/hbeh.2001.1749 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.12.013 · DOI
- 10.1159/000179779 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.004 · DOI
- Richter‐Appelt H, 2005, Gender identity and recalled gender related childhood play‐behaviour in adult individuals with different forms of intersexuality, Anthropol Anz, 63, 241, 10.1127/anthranz/63/2005/241 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10508-010-9624-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dumais, K. M., Bredewold, R., Mayer, T. E., & Veenema, A. H. (2013) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.08.012 · Cited by 201
Transgenerational effects of prenatal bisphenol A on social recognition
Wolstenholme, J. T., Goldsby, J. A., & Rissman, E. F. (2013) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.09.007 · Cited by 157
Self-citationEffects of sex and gonadectomy on social investigation and social recognition in mice
Karlsson, S. A., Haziri, K., Hansson, E., Kettunen, P., & Westberg, L. (2015) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/s12868-015-0221-z · Cited by 72
“Since there are several differences between their study and ours with respect to study designs, type of paradigms and steroid treatment regimes in the other studies, strict comparisons of our results are problematic [17].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNeuroendocrine underpinning of social recognition in males and females
Aspesi, D., & Choleris, E. (2022) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/jne.13070 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Tejada, L. D., & Rissman, E. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rissman, E. F.
- ORCID
- Rissman, E. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-05
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1144-1153
- ISSN
- 0953-8194 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2826
- PMC
- PMC3615635
- OpenAlex
- W1926415972
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH057759)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007323)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Keywords
- androgen receptor, social investigation, sex differences, estradiol, testosterone, gonadectomy, sex chromosomes, habituation-dishabituation, neonatal androgen exposure, mice
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Estradiol, Female, Genotype, Male, Receptors, Androgen, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Testosterone, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review