Cited by 494Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorMemory and Neural MechanismsOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

The neuroendocrine basis of social recognition

Ferguson, Jennifer N., Young, Larry J., Insel, Thomas R.·2002·Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

All social relationships are dependent on an organism's ability to remember conspecifics. Social memory may be a unique form of memory, critical for reproduction, territorial defense, and the establishment of dominance hierarchies in a natural context. In the laboratory, social memory can be assessed reliably by measuring the reduction in investigation of a familiar partner relative to novel conspecifics. The neurohypophyseal neuropeptides oxytocin and vasopressin have been shown to influence a number of forms of social behavior, including affiliation, aggression, and reproduction. This article reviews vasopressin and oxytocin effects on social cognition, particularly the acquisition and retention of social recognition in rats and mice. Studies in rats have demonstrated that vasopressin in specific neural pathways, such as the lateral septum, is necessary for social recognition. As vasopressin facilitates recall when given after an initial encounter, the peptide appears important for the consolidation not the acquisition of a social memory. Although oxytocin has complex effects on social memory in rats, mice with a null mutation of the oxytocin gene are completely socially amnestic without other cognitive deficits evident. As oxytocin given centrally before but not after the initial encounter restores social recognition in these mutant mice, the neuropeptide appears critical for the acquisition rather than the consolidation phase of memory. Oxytocin's effects on social memory are mediated via a discrete cell population in the medial amygdala. These findings support the hypothesis that vasopressin and oxytocin are essential for social memory, although they appear to influence different cognitive processes and may modulate different neural systems. (c) Elsevier Science.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/frne.2002.0229

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferguson, J. N., Young, L. J., & Insel, T. R.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
200-224
ISSN
0091-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160600642
Cited by
494
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 21
FWCI
28.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH56538, R01MH056538)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
social recognition, social memory, oxytocin, vasopressin, social cognition, memory consolidation, memory acquisition, lateral septum, medial amygdala, rats, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Male, Memory, Neurosecretory Systems, Social Behavior, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review