Cited by 181Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Improving actigraphic sleep estimates in insomnia and dementia: how many nights?

VAN SOMEREN, EUS J. W.·2007·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

Summary: In order to investigate how the duration of actigraphic recordings affects the reliability of actigraphic estimates of sleep and 24‐h activity rhythm variables, two to 3 weeks of actigraphy were recorded, from which pairs of variables derived from two periods of increasing length (1–10 days) were compared. Two groups were studied: (1) 10 subjects suffering from primary insomnia; and (2) 12 demented elderly subjects living semi‐independently in group care facilities of homes for the elderly. Actigraphic estimates of primary measures of sleep (duration and efficiency) and of the 24‐h activity pattern (interdaily stability, intradaily variability and amplitude) were calculated on variable lengths of the actigraphic recordings. The average absolute difference of two estimates decreased – and reliability increased – strongly with an increasing number of days analysed. An acceptable reliability of the interdaily stability estimate required more than 7 days of recording. It can be concluded that a valuable improvement in the reliability of actigraphic sleep estimates can be obtained by simply increasing the number of recording nights. The results support the importance of day‐to‐day variability in insomnia and dementia that has already been previously noted by others, and even suggest the presence of ’week‐to‐week’ variability. This variability may have been involved in the equivocal results of treatment studies in insomnia and dementia where outcome measures were based on a limited number of nights. Such studies could profit from extension of the recording duration to, e.g. 2 weeks, and from the inclusion of variability measures as measures of clinical interest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2007.00592.x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reliable long-term assessment of skin temperature in field studies has recently become as feasible as actigraphic assessments of sleep-wake rhythms has been for many years.

    “Since the reliable long-term assessment of skin temperature in field studies has recently become as feasible as actigraphic assessments of sleep–wake rhythms has been for many years [82, 87, 90, 91], it would be of value to assess skin temperature profiles in large cohorts of people with and without sleep complaints.”

    From Sleep, vigilance, and thermosensitivity (2012) · cites this paper as [87]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VAN SOMEREN, E. J. W.
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-17
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
269-275
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W1977003964
Cited by
181
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Academy of Sleep Medicine
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
actigraphy, recording duration, primary insomnia, dementia, interdaily stability, intradaily variability, sleep efficiency, day-to-day variability, elderly residents
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Circadian Rhythm, Dementia, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Polysomnography, Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review