Cited by 392Thermoregulation and physiological responsesCircadian rhythm and melatoninThermal Regulation in Medicine

Evaluation of wireless determination of skin temperature using iButtons

Open access
VANMARKENLICHTENBELT, W, DAANEN, H, WOUTERS, L, FRONCZEK, R, RAYMANN, R, SEVERENS, N, VANSOMEREN, E·2006·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Measurements of skin temperatures are often complicated because of the use of wired sensors. This is so in field studies, but also holds for many laboratory conditions. This article describes a wireless temperature system for human skin temperature measurements, i.e. the Thermochron iButton DS1291H. The study deals with validation of the iButton and its application on the human skin, and describes clinical and field measurements. The validation study shows that iButtons have a mean accuracy of -0.09 degrees C (-0.4 degrees C at most) with a precision of 0.05 degrees C (0.09 degrees C at most). These properties can be improved by using calibration. Due to the size of the device the response time is longer than that of conventional sensors, with a tau in water of 19 s. On the human skin under transient conditions the response time is significantly longer, revealing momentary deviations with a magnitude of 1 degrees C. The use of iButtons has been described in studies on circadian rhythms, sleep and cardiac surgery. With respect to circadian rhythm and sleep research, skin temperature assessment by iButtons is of significant value in laboratory, clinical and home situations. We demonstrate that differences in laboratory and field measurements add to our understanding of thermophysiology under natural living conditions. The advantage of iButtons in surgery research is that they are easy to sterilize and wireless so that they do not hinder the surgical procedure. In conclusion, the application of iButtons is advantageous for measuring skin temperatures in those situations in which wired instruments are unpractical and fast responses are not required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.04.026

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The diurnal rhythm of proximal skin temperature is more complex but under real-life conditions appears to vary in phase with the distal skin temperature rhythm.

    “The diurnal rhythm of the proximal skin temperature (e.g., infraclavicular region, sternum) is more complex but, under real-life conditions, appears to vary in phase with the distal skin temperature rhythm [48,49].”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

  • Distal skin temperature varies with the time of day.

    “Distal skin temperature (i.e., temperature of hands and feet) has also been reported to vary with the time of day [5,6,48,49].”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

  • Reliable long-term assessment of skin temperature in field studies has recently become as feasible as actigraphic assessments of sleep-wake rhythms has been for many years.

    “Since the reliable long-term assessment of skin temperature in field studies has recently become as feasible as actigraphic assessments of sleep–wake rhythms has been for many years [82, 87, 90, 91], it would be of value to assess skin temperature profiles in large cohorts of people with and without sleep complaints.”

    From Sleep, vigilance, and thermosensitivity (2012) · cites this paper as [82]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VANMARKENLICHTENBELT, W., DAANEN, H., WOUTERS, L., FRONCZEK, R., RAYMANN, R., SEVERENS, N., & VANSOMEREN, E.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
VANMARKENLICHTENBELT, W
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07-30
Volume
88
Issue
4-5
Pages
489-497
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150134525
Cited by
392
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Thermal Regulation in Medicine
Keywords
skin temperature measurement, iButton, wireless temperature sensor, sensor accuracy and precision, sensor calibration, sensor response time, circadian rhythm, sleep, cardiac surgery, thermal physiology, field measurements
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Circadian Rhythm, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Environment, Controlled, Female, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Hypothermia, Induced, Intraoperative Period, Male, Microcomputers, Skin Temperature, Sleep, Telemetry, Temperature, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review