Cited by 130Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologySchizophrenia research and treatment

Stability of self‐esteem in bipolar disorder: comparisons among remitted bipolar patients, remitted unipolar patients and healthy controls1

Knowles, Rebecca, Tai, Sara, Jones, Steven H, Highfield, Julie, Morriss, Richard, Bentall, Richard P·2007·Bipolar Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Changes in beliefs about the self are a central feature of bipolar disorder, with grandiose self-belief common in mania and low self-esteem evident in periods of depression. We investigated whether unstable self-esteem is a characteristic of bipolar disorder in remission. METHODS: We compared 18 patients with DSM-IV bipolar disorder in remission, 16 patients with unipolar disorder in remission, and 19 healthy controls. The primary measure was a diary kept for one week and completed twice each day, measuring self-esteem and positive and negative affect. We also administered Winters and Neale's (J Abnorm Psychol 1985; 94: 282-290) implicit measure of attributional style. RESULTS: Whereas mean levels of self-esteem and affect were not abnormal in the remitted bipolar patients, the bipolar patients showed strong fluctuations in these processes. In common with the unipolar patients, they also showed a pessimistic attributional style on the Pragmatic Inference Task (PIT). CONCLUSIONS: Instability of self-esteem and affect is present in bipolar patients, even when their symptoms are in remission, and has previously been found in people at genetic risk of the disorder. It may be a marker of vulnerability to the disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00457.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knowles, R., Tai, S., Jones, S. H., Highfield, J., Morriss, R., & Bentall, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Bentall, Richard P
Venue
Bipolar Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
490-495
ISSN
  • 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-5618
OpenAlex
W1995084148
Cited by
130
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bipolar Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
bipolar disorder, self-esteem, remission, major depressive disorder, neuroticism, attributional style, daily diary, vulnerability indicators
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Remission Induction, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review