Cited by 339Evolution and Paleontology StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetryGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis

Open access
FRECKLETON, R. P.·2009·Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

Phylogenetic comparative methods are extremely commonly used in evolutionary biology. In this paper, I highlight some of the problems that are frequently encountered in comparative analyses and review how they can be fixed. In broad terms, the problems boil down to a lack of appreciation of the underlying assumptions of comparative methods, as well as problems with implementing methods in a manner akin to more familiar statistical approaches. I highlight that the advent of more flexible computing environments should improve matters and allow researchers greater scope to explore methods and data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01757.x

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. J O U R N A L C O M P I L A T I O N ª 2 0 0 9 E U R O P E A N S O C I E T Y F O R E V O L U T I O N A R Y B I O L O G Y 14209101, 2009, 7, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01757.x by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FRECKLETON, R. P.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
FRECKLETON, R. P.
Venue
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Published
2009-06-22
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
1367-1375
ISSN
  • 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
  • 1420-9101
OpenAlex
W2102746773
Cited by
339
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 22
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
phylogenetic comparative analysis, methodological assumptions
MeSH terms
Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review