Cited by 197Skin Protection and AgingContact Dermatitis and AllergiesNanoparticles: synthesis and applications

A pilot study on the percutaneous absorption of microfine titanium dioxide from sunscreens

Tan, Mei‐Heng, Commens, Chris A, Burnett, Leslie, Snitch, Peter J·1996·Australasian Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Many Australians are being advised to apply microfine titanium dioxide sunscreen daily from the cradle to the grave. However, there is a surprising lack of data on the percutaneous absorption of microfine titanium dioxide. A prospective pilot study was conducted to analyse the percutaneous absorption of microfine titanium dioxide from sunscreens. Selected patients scheduled to have skin surgery, applied titanium dioxide sunscreen to the skin daily for 2–6 weeks prior to their operation. After excision, the stratum corneum of the sample was stripped and the titanium concentration of the remaining epidermis and dermis was measured by inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry. The results from this pilot study showed that levels of titanium in the epidermis and dermis of subjects who applied microfine titanium dioxide to their skin were higher than the levels of titanium found in controls. Studies with larger cohorts are necessary to establish if this absorption is statistically significant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-0960.1996.tb01050.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no increased level of penetration of nano-sized TiO2 and ZnO when compared to macro-sized counterparts.

    “There is no increased level of penetration when compared to the macro-sized counterparts.”
  • A large number of in vitro and in vivo studies using murine, porcine, or human skin have shown that nano-sized TiO2 and ZnO remain at the stratum corneum level.

    “However, a large number of in vitro and in vivo studies using murine, porcine, or human skin have shown that the nano-sized TiO2 and ZnO remain at the stratum corneum level (56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, M., Commens, C. A., Burnett, L., & Snitch, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Westmead Hospital (AU)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Commens, Chris A
Venue
Australasian Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-11
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
185-187
ISSN
  • 0004-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-0960
OpenAlex
W2029664240
Cited by
197
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australasian Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Keywords
sunscreen, percutaneous absorption, stratum corneum, epidermis, dermis, skin surgery
MeSH terms
Absorption, Administration, Topical, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cadaver, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Reference Values, Skin, Sunscreening Agents, Titanium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review