Cited by 174Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Single-Unit Sympathetic Discharge: Quantitative Assessment in Human Hypertensive Disease

Greenwood, John P., Stoker, John B., Mary, David A. S. G.·1999·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Reports demonstrating sympathetic hyperactivity in hypertension with the use of microneurography have been inconsistent. One possible reason is that previous studies have assessed muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) from integrated voltage waves (“bursts”) recorded from multiunit discharges. We studied single units with defined vasoconstrictor properties (s-MSNA) to further characterize sympathetic output in hypertensive disease. Methods and Results —We examined 74 subjects with a wide range of arterial blood pressure that were considered to be either normal (NT), high normal (HN), or stages 1 to 3 essential hypertension (EHT-1, EHT-2/3). All had their peripheral sympathetic activity measured from both multiunit bursts and single-unit vasoconstrictor impulses. There was a significant correlation between s-MSNA and MSNA, and results of variability studies were similar. The EHT-1 and EHT-2/3 groups had greater s-MSNA and MSNA than did the matched NT group (always P <0.01). The HN group also had greater s-MSNA and MSNA than did the NT group (mean±SEM; 43±5 vs 29±2 impulses/100 beats, P <0.05; 36±4 vs 24±2 bursts/100 beats, P <0.05). In addition, the EHT-1 group had significantly greater s-MSNA than did the EHT-2/3 group (63±6 vs 51±3 impulses/100 beats, P <0.05), which could not be demonstrated with MSNA bursts. Conclusions —Quantification from single vasoconstrictor units has provided additional evidence in established essential hypertension of increased central sympathetic output. Furthermore, in the mild or early stages of hypertension, this technique has provided new evidence of augmented sympathetic output compared with more severe hypertension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.100.12.1305

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under resting conditions, the variability between repeat recordings of both s-MSNA and MSNA is less than 8%.

    “Finally, although the technique of microneurography is selective for the particular unit(s) studied, under resting conditions the variability between repeat recordings of both s-MSNA and MSNA is <8% (16).”
  • The results obtained from MSNA recordings in this study were similar to those previously published in age-comparable hypertensive subjects.

    “The results obtained from MSNA recordings in this study were similar to those previously published in age-comparable hypertensive subjects (15,16,25,26,28).”
  • In stage 1 hypertensive disease, peripheral sympathetic drive is higher than in more severe degrees of hypertension.

    “more recently, we have shown that, in stage 1 hypertensive disease, the peripheral sympathetic drive is, in fact, higher than that found in the more severe degrees of hypertension (16).”
  • In patients with moderate to severe hypertension, sympathetic output was lower or equal compared with matched groups with milder hypertension, depending on whether single units or multiunits were examined.

    “More recently, we have shown that patients with moderate to severe hypertension had either lower or equal sympathetic output compared with matched groups with milder hypertension, depending on whether single units or multiunits were examined (16).”
  • In the former study, subjects with severe hypertension had a high left ventricular mass index, whereas in the latter study left ventricular hypertrophy was excluded.

    “Finally, and perhaps most importantly, subjects with severe hypertension in the former study had a high LVMI, whereas, in the latter study, LVH was excluded.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenwood, J. P., Stoker, J. B., & Mary, D. A. S. G.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
Circulation
Published
1999-09-21
Volume
100
Issue
12
Pages
1305-1310
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2001261464
Cited by
174
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
essential hypertension, sympathetic nervous system, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, sympathetic hyperactivity, early hypertension, high-normal blood pressure, microneurography
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Adult, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Sympathetic Nervous System, Vasoconstriction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review