Cited by 337Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingGender, Feminism, and Media

Understanding Sexual Objectification: A Comprehensive Approach Toward Media Exposure and Girls' Internalization of Beauty Ideals, Self-Objectification, and Body Surveillance: Media, Adolescent Girls, and Self-Objectification

Open access
Vandenbosch, Laura, Eggermont, Steven·2012·Journal of Communication

Abstract

The relationship between exposure to sexually objectifying music television, primetime television programs, fashion magazines, and social networking sites and the internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance was examined among adolescent girls (N = 558). A structural equation model showed direct relationships between sexually objectifying media and the internalization of beauty ideals, and indirect relationships between sexually objectifying media and self-objectification, and body surveillance through the internalization of beauty ideals. The direct relationships between sexually objectifying media and the internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance differed across the types of sexually objectifying media. The discussion focuses on the implications of these findings to explain self-objectification among girls.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01667.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Body shame, strongly related to self-objectification experiences, could be enhanced by the typical one-to-many style of interactions and the exposure of individuals' body image that SNS promote.

    “This body shame, strongly related to self-objectification experiences, could be enhanced by the typical one-to-many style of interactions and the exposure of individuals' body image that SNS promote (Manago et al., 2015; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Parker, E. (2002). Ladies Home Journal: A content analysis of the marriage advice given in Ladies Home Journal from the 1950s and 1990s. Paper presented at the AEJMC Conference, Florida.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2012-08-27
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
869-887
ISSN
0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1711406194
Cited by
337
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7
FWCI
16.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
sexual objectification, media exposure, beauty standards, self-objectification, body surveillance, adolescent girls, music television, prime-time television, fashion magazines, social networking sites, media influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review