Cited by 269Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesGender, Feminism, and Media

Facebook Involvement, Objectified Body Consciousness, Body Shame, and Sexual Assertiveness in College Women and Men

Manago, Adriana M., Ward, L. Monique, Lemm, Kristi M., Reed, Lauren, Seabrook, Rita·2015·Sex Roles

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11199-014-0441-1

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous studies have linked adolescents' and young adults' social media use with traditional measures of self-objectification.

    “Numerous studies have now linked adolescents' and young adults' SM use with traditional measures of self-objectification (e.g., Manago et al., 2015; Salomon & Brown, 2020; Skowronski et al., 2020; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2016).”
  • Facebook involvement and exposure predict body surveillance, which in turn predicts greater body shame.

    “On the contrary, only a few studies have focused on OBC body shame and they have found that Facebook involvement and exposure predict body surveillance, which in turn predicts greater body shame (Manago et al., 2015; Slater & Tiggemann, 2015; Tiggemann & Slater, 2013, 2015).”
  • SNS users, especially adolescents, might invest in photo-related control and activities, trying to show and share on SNS their ideal self-image as well as becoming more worried about their appearance and body image, picture quality, and strategies to taking, choosing, and editing their shared photos online.

    “Consequently, SNS users, especially adolescents, might invest in photo-related control and activities, trying to show and share on SNS their ideal self-image (McLean et al. 2015) as well as becoming more worried about their appearance and body image, picture quality, and strategies to taking, choosing, and editing their shared photos online (Boursier & Manna, 2019; Manago et al., 2015; McLean et”
  • Body shame, strongly related to self-objectification experiences, could be enhanced by the typical one-to-many style of interactions and the exposure of individuals' body image that SNS promote.

    “This body shame, strongly related to self-objectification experiences, could be enhanced by the typical one-to-many style of interactions and the exposure of individuals' body image that SNS promote (Manago et al., 2015; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manago, A. M., Ward, L. M., Lemm, K. M., Reed, L., & Seabrook, R.
Affiliations
  • Western Washington University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Manago, Adriana M.
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
2014-12-12
Volume
72
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W2094114851
Cited by
269
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4
FWCI
13.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
Facebook use, objectified body consciousness, body shame, sexual assertiveness, social networking sites, gender differences, university students, body surveillance, sexualization, body image, sexual agency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review