Cited by 200Species Distribution and Climate ChangeEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

Climate change and community disassembly: impacts of warming on tropical and temperate montane community structure

Sheldon, Kimberly S., Yang, Sylvia, Tewksbury, Joshua J.·2011·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Both tropical and temperate species are responding to global warming through range shifts, but our understanding of the consequences of these shifts for whole communities is limited. Here, we use current elevational range data for six taxonomic groups spanning 90° in latitude to examine the potential impacts of climate-driven range shifts on community change, or 'disassembly', across latitude. Elevational ranges are smaller at low latitudes for most groups and, as a consequence, tropical communities appear to be more sensitive to temperature increases compared with temperate communities. Under site-specific temperature projections, we generally found greater community disassembly in tropical compared with temperate communities, although this varied by dispersal assumptions. Mountain height can impact the amount of community disassembly, with greater change occurring on smaller mountains. Finally, projected community disassembly was higher for ectotherms than endotherms, although the variation among ectotherms was greater than the variation separating endotherms and ectotherms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01689.x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altitudinal shifts can cause rapid changes in community structure, disrupting coevolved interactions, creating "no-analogue communities," and contributing to community disassembly via accelerated extinctions.

    “However, altitudinal shifts can also cause rapid changes in community structure, disrupting coevolved interactions, creating “no-analogue communities,” and contributing to community disassembly via accelerated extinctions (120, 121).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheldon, K. S., Yang, S., & Tewksbury, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Sheldon, Kimberly S.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-07
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
1191-1200
ISSN
1461-023X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101321903
Cited by
200
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Washington Research Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
community disassembly, global warming, altitudinal range shift, latitudinal gradient, mountain height, dispersal, ectotherms, endotherms, species range limits, temperature projections
MeSH terms
Altitude, Animals, Coleoptera, Computer Simulation, Models, Biological, Tropical Climate, Vertebrates, Ecosystem, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review