Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 428

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular mechanisms underlying the probiotic effects of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 involve ZO-2 and PKC? redistribution resulting in tight junction and epithelial barrier repair

Open access
Zyrek, Agata A., Cichon, Christoph, Helms, Simone, Enders, Corinne, Sonnenborn, Ulrich, Schmidt, M. Alexander·2007·Cellular Microbiology

Abstract

The probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 (EcN) has been used for decades in human medicine in Central Europe for the treatment and prevention of intestinal disorders and diseases. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying its beneficial effects are only partially understood. To identify molecular responses induced by EcN that might contribute to its probiotic properties polarized T84 cells were investigated employing DNA microarrays, quantitative RT-PCR, Western blotting, immunofluorescence and specific protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors. Polarized T84 epithelial cell monolayers were used as a model to monitor barrier disruption by infection with the enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) strain E2348/69. Co-incubation of EPEC with EcN or addition of EcN following EPEC infection abolished barrier disruption and, moreover, restored barrier integrity as monitored by transepithelial resistance. DNA-microarray analysis of T84 cells incubated with EcN identified 300+ genes exhibiting altered expression. EcN altered the expression, distribution of zonula occludens-2 (ZO-2) protein and of distinct PKC isotypes. ZO-2 expression was enhanced in parallel to its redistribution towards the cell boundaries. This study provides evidence that EcN induces an overriding signalling effect leading to restoration of a disrupted epithelial barrier. This is transmitted via silencing of PKCzeta and the redistribution of ZO-2. We suggest that these properties contribute to the reported efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases and in part rationalize the probiotic nature of EcN.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00836.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Avila-Flores A., 1990, Infect Immun, 58, 761, 10.1128/IAI.58.3.761-765.1990 · doi:10.1128/iai.58.3.761-765.1990
  2. 10.1136/gut.52.3.439 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00681.x · DOI
  4. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.04.015 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1074/jbc.M109254200 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Crane J.K., 1997, Infect Immun, 65, 3277, 10.1128/IAI.65.8.3277-3285.1997 · doi:10.1128/iai.65.8.3277-3285.1997
  7. 10.1128/IAI.68.10.5998-6004.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/s002329900020 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.045 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00663-7 · DOI
  11. 10.1006/scdb.2000.0178 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1128/IAI.01449-05 · DOI
  13. 10.1128/JB.186.16.5432-5441.2004 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1309/UMW9-D06Q-M94Q-JGH2 · doi:10.1309/umw9-d06q-m94q-jgh2
  15. Hecht G., 1999, Am J Physiol, 277, C441, 10.1152/ajpcell.1999.277.3.C441 · DOI
  16. Isolauri E., 2002, Gut, 50, 54, 10.1136/gut.50.suppl_3.iii54 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02051.x · DOI
  18. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00225.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1136/gut.2003.037747 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/S0301-472X(02)00892-5 · doi:10.1016/s0301-472x(02)00892-5
  21. 10.1128/CMR.19.2.315-337.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Lodinova-Zadnikova R.U., 1997, Biol Neonate, 71, 224, 10.1159/000244421 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/nri1373 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Madara J.L., 1987, Gastroenterology, 92, 1133, 10.1016/S0016-5085(87)91069-9 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1053/gast.2001.27224 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Mitic L.L., 2000, Am J Physiol, 279, G250
  27. Mollenbrink M., 1994, Med Klin (Munich), 89, 587
  28. Nissle A., 1916, Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 42, 1181, 10.1055/s-0028-1135392 · DOI
  29. Nissle A., 1919, Munch Med Wschr, 25, 678
  30. Nissle A., 1925, Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 44, 1809, 10.1055/s-0028-1137292 · DOI
  31. 10.1152/ajpgi.00341.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1038/nrmicro1349 · DOI
  33. Philpott D.J., 1998, Infect Immun, 66, 1680, 10.1128/IAI.66.4.1680-1687.1998 · DOI
  34. 10.1056/NEJMra020831 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02132-1 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)06343-0 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1136/gut.52.7.988 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1301/nr.2003.marr.91-99 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1097/00001574-200307000-00006 · DOI
  40. Sartor R.B., 2004, Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 21, 44
  41. Savkovic S.D., 1996, Infect Immun, 64, 4480, 10.1128/IAI.64.11.4480-4487.1996 · DOI
  42. Savkovic S.D., 2003, Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 285, C512, 10.1152/ajpcell.00444.2002 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70495-9 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1152/ajpcell.00558.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1159/000073243 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/35087138 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1038/nm0706-736 · DOI
  48. 10.1128/IAI.73.8.5183-5188.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.020 · DOI
  50. Song J.C., 2001, Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 281, C649, 10.1152/ajpcell.2001.281.2.C649 · DOI
  51. Spitz J., 1995, Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 268, G374, 10.1152/ajpgi.1995.268.2.G374 · DOI
  52. 10.1073/pnas.92.13.6072 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1452-1465.2005 · DOI
  54. 10.1083/jcb.152.6.1183 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Thykjaer T., 2001, Cancer Res, 61, 2492
  56. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.06.014 · DOI
  57. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1128/IAI.72.10.5750-5758.2004 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1016/j.femsim.2004.10.023 · DOI
  60. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.053 · DOI
  61. 10.1097/00001574-200411000-00011 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70006-4 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 428

Metadata

Authors
Zyrek, A. A., Cichon, C., Helms, S., Enders, C., Sonnenborn, U., & Schmidt, M. A.
Venue
Cellular Microbiology
Published
2007-03
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
804-816
ISSN
  • 1462-5814 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-5822
OpenAlex
W2032367064
Cited by
428
References
1
FWCI
22.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 3106 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular mechanisms underlying the probiotic effects of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 involve ZO-2 and PKC? redistribution resulting in tight junction and epithelial barrier repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00836.x
The paper
Zyrek, A. A., Cichon, C., Helms, S., Enders, C., Sonnenborn, U., & Schmidt, M. A. (2007). Molecular mechanisms underlying the probiotic effects of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 involve ZO-2 and PKC? redistribution resulting in tight junction and epithelial barrier repair. Cellular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00836.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.