Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,015

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ENACTED SENSEMAKING IN CRISIS SITUATIONS[1]

Open access
Weick, Karl E.·1988·Journal of Management Studies
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00039.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Sensemaking in crisis conditions is made more difficult because action that is instrumental to understanding the crisis often intensifies the crisis. This dilemma is interpreted from the perspective that people enact the environments which constrain them. It is argued that commitment, capacity, and expectations affect sensemaking during crisis and the severity of the crisis itself. It is proposed that the core concepts of enactment may comprise an ideology that reduces the likelihood of crisis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00039.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1016/0160-791X(87)90028-5 · DOI
  2. Bateson G., 1972, Steps to an Ecology of Mind
  3. Beyer J. M., 1981, Handbook of Organizational Design., 166
  4. 10.2307/2392456 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Diamond S., 1985, ‘The Bhopal disaster: how it happened’, New York Times, 28, 167
  6. Diamond S., 1985, ‘The disaster in Bhopal: workers recall horror’, New York Times, 30, 16
  7. 10.1007/978-3-642-68390-9 · DOI · Paper page
  8. George A. L., 1986, The Medical Implications of Nuclear War
  9. 10.2307/2390887 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.234.4772.41 · DOI
  11. Jones R. A., 1977, Self‐Fulfilling Prophecies
  12. 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90067-6 · DOI
  13. Mchugh P., 1968, Defining the Situation
  14. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00059.x · DOI
  15. 10.5465/AME.1987.4275639 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Perrow C., 1984, Normal Accidents.
  17. Salancik G. R., 1977, New Directions in Organizational Behavior, 1
  18. 10.2307/2392563 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Shrivastava P., 1987, Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis.
  20. 10.2307/258041 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1126/science.225.4665.907 · DOI
  22. Snyder M., 1984, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 247
  23. Staw B. M., 1980, Research in Organizational Behavior, 45
  24. Staw B. M., 1982, Change in Organizations: New Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice, 87
  25. 10.2307/2392337 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 1951, WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY of SYNONYMS
  27. Weick K. E., 1979, The Social Psychology of Organizing
  28. 10.2307/41165243 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Social Cognition in Organizations, 102
  30. 10.2307/2786243 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Weick, K. E.
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-07
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
305-317
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00039.x
OpenAlex
W2115779401
Cited by
2,015
References
2
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 6882 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.