The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Examination of Differences Between Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation*
Open accessAbstract
abstract Organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation have similar antecedents, social construction processes and consequences. Nonetheless, an improved understanding of relationships between legitimacy and reputation requires that differences between the two be specified and clarified. Our examination of past research indicates that legitimacy emphasizes the social acceptance resulting from adherence to social norms and expectations whereas reputation emphasizes comparisons among organizations. We empirically examine two antecedents of the financial, regulatory, and public dimensions of legitimacy and reputation in a population of US commercial banks. We find that isomorphism improves legitimacy, but its effects on reputation depend on the bank's reputation. Moreover, higher financial performance increases reputation, but does not increase the legitimacy of high performing banks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.177 · Cited by 2,228
Cited by
Organizational Reputation: A Review
Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310390963 · Cited by 960
Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0608 · Cited by 646
Keeping up Appearances: Reputational Threat and Impression Management after Social Movement Boycotts
McDonnell, M.-H., & King, B. (2013) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839213500032 · Cited by 618
Social media and the formation of organizational reputation
Etter, M., Ravasi, D., & Colleoni, E. (2019) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0280 · Cited by 428
Casey, R. J., & Grenier, J. H. (2015) · AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-50736 · Cited by 421
Rethinking the Relationship Between Reputation and Legitimacy: A Social Actor Conceptualization
King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2008) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/crr.2008.16 · Cited by 343
Buhmann, A., Paßmann, J., & Fieseler, C. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04226-4 · Cited by 167
O'Sullivan, N., & O'Dwyer, B. (2009) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570910955443 · Cited by 154
Employer branding and career theory: new directions for research
Martin, G., & Cerdin, J.-L. (2014) · Strategic Talent Management · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139424585.009 · Cited by 20
Asogwa, I. E. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135842 · Cited by 12
Baan Wahh, W., Wong Sek Khin, E., & Abdullah, M. (2020) · Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives · doi:10.22452/ajap.vol13no2.2 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-22
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 329-360
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2019422872
- Cited by
- 1,301
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 68.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
