The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inter‐ and Intra‐Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences
Abstract
abstract Research on organizational knowledge transfer is burgeoning, and yet our understanding of its antecedents and consequences remains rather unclear. Although conceptual and qualitative reviews of the organizational knowledge transfer literature have emerged, no study has attempted to summarize previous quantitative empirical findings. As a first step towards that goal, we use meta‐analytic techniques to examine how knowledge, organization and network level antecedents differentially impact organizational knowledge transfer. Additionally, we consolidate research on the relationship between knowledge transfer and its consequences. We also demonstrate how the intra‐ and inter‐organizational context, the directionality of knowledge transfers, and measurement characteristics moderate the relationships studied. By aggregating and consolidating existing research, our study not only reveals new insights into the levers and outcomes of organizational knowledge transfer, but also provides meaningful directions for future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The development of recombination FSAs is also shaped by inter-unit, intra-MNE relationships as they define the degree to which a firm transmits knowledge to a subsidiary”
From Innovation in and from emerging economies: New insights and lessons for international business research (2021) · cites this paper as Van Wijk et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134367 · Cited by 9,665
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809
Research works printed but not linked: 103
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.388 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.2000.2883 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.387 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.13.3.274.2778 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400094 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00272-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490078 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208690 · DOI
- Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
- 10.2307/2393553 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/20159632 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1040.0075 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134 · DOI
- Cyert R., 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm
- 10.2307/256406 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.41.11.1750 · DOI
- 10.2307/1251915 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00096.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.021 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400098 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200002)21:2<99::AID-SMJ80>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-6486.00203 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.273 · DOI
- 10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.44 · DOI
- 10.2307/3152095 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0192 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
- Hambrick D. C., 1994, Research in Organizational Behavior, 171
- 10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.421 · DOI
- Hedges L. V., 1985, Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
- 10.1002/smj.4250150906 · DOI
- 10.2307/20159575 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-6486.00215 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281445 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amj.2005.19573106 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400107 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
- 10.2307/3069433 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.297 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00482.x · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.206 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2006.22527456 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.379 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490923 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490155 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.14.2.173.14997 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490156 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.14.3.297.15165 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.484 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400056 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250171108 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400120 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840605050874 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.329 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00395-8 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.260 · DOI
- 10.1177/014920639902500406 · DOI
- 10.1111/1540-5885.00028 · DOI
- 10.2307/3556658 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/258107 · DOI
- 10.1509/jmkg.65.2.1.18253 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.398 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.49.6.751.16026 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::AID-SMJ93>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1 · DOI
- 10.2307/3069409 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.14.4.440.17483 · DOI
- 10.2307/259020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:7<595::AID-SMJ47>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
- 10.2307/256726 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2005.16928421 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.290 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8<831::AID-SMJ123>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
- 10.5465/AMJ.2005.16928394 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.163 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1040.0096 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.337 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200009)21:9<925::AID-SMJ129>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
- Tsai W., 2001, Knowledge transfer in intra‐organizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 996, 10.2307/3069443 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536 · DOI
- 10.2307/257085 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.251 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250160917 · DOI
- 10.2307/20159030 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1050.0126 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1040.0080 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.183 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.482 · DOI
- 10.2307/4134351 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.229 · DOI
- 10.2307/1556420 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.6.1.76 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840605051820 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.514.14423 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.8.3.209 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–982 of 982
McPhillips, M. (2026) · European Conference on Knowledge Management · doi:10.34190/eckm.27.1.4888
“The gap in partnerships emerges from distributed knowledge stocks and collective action problems structurally distinct from intra-organisational barriers (Easterby-Smith, Lyles and Tsang, 2008; van Wijk, Jansen and Lyles, 2008; Dyer and Singh, 1998).”
Gu, A.-W., Ke, J.-J., & Zhang, A. (2026) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-03-2026-0594
Eriksen, T., Gleiss, M. S., & Sæther, E. (2026) · Teaching and Teacher Education : An International Journal of Research and Studies · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2026.105560
Dhaigude, A. S., Sardana, D., & Gupta, N. (2026) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-026-10149-2
Galstyan, S. H. (2026) · Knowledge and Process Management · doi:10.1002/kpm.70125
Serrasqueiro, J., & Franco, M. (2026) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-03-2026-0111
Tang, J., Evans, J., Lyytinen, K., & Singh, J. (2026) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2026.101969
Street-Level Turnover, Human Resource Policy Reforms, and Outcomes in Complex Public Organizations
Dhillon, A. (2026) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x261441821
Bennie, J., Withers, M. D., Chen, X., Panos, J., Zhang, K., Morgan, M., Yeh, P., Zhang, T., & Graham, M. (2026) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2026.2656669
CFO work experience, tax strategy diffusion and corporate tax avoidance
Trinh, T. (2026) · Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society · doi:10.1108/cg-10-2024-0518
Figueiredo, N. D. L., Fernandes, C. I., & Abrantes, J. L. (2026) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-026-03245-7
“Knowledge transfer (KT) constitutes a central mechanism through which organizations acquire, exchange, and apply knowledge across organizational boundaries (Manfredi Latilla et al., 2019 ; Van Wijk et al., 2008).”
Tuned Out or Dialed In: How Attributions Shape Observer Reactions to Music Listeners at Work
Gencay, O., Foulk, T. A., & Schaerer, M. (2026) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.70025
“Yet, employees perceived as poor performers are often judged as less invested in their tasks, leading observers to perceive support as less effective or warranted (e.g., Van Wijk et al. 2008 ; Warr and Inceoglu 2012 ).”
Yang, W., Liu, X., Zhou, Y., & Zhou, H. (2026) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-07-2025-0446 · Cited by 1
Li, M., Yu, W., & Li, Y. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-37838-8
“Traditional organizational studies emphasize social and structural factors influencing knowledge transfer 11,12 , while computational approaches prioritize algorithmic efficiency without accounting for organizational context 16,17 .”
Nas, T. I., Şahin, F., Golgeci, I., & Okan, T. (2026) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2026.101340
Jin, S., Zhang, Y., & Wang, C. (2025) · Nankai Business Review International · doi:10.1108/nbri-07-2024-0070
Science–Business Interaction: Challenges in Defining Knowledge Transfer. Part 2
Samovoleva, S. A. (2025) · Science management theory and practice · doi:10.19181/smtp.2025.7.3.7
Evaluating Knowledge Co-Creation Within One Dentsu: Collaboration and Governance in Dentsu Indonesia
Kencana, C. V. G., & Ghazali, A. (2025) · Eduvest - Journal Of Universal Studies · doi:10.59188/eduvest.v5i9.51342
“The study was guided by two theoretical frameworks: Knowledge Co-Creation (KCC) developed by Namisango et al. (2021) and Knowledge Governance as explored by Foss & Mahoney (2010) and Wijk et al. (2008).”
Salmen, K., Festing, M., & Harsch, K. (2025) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2025.09.007
Choi, Y., Ryu, S., Park, S., & Lee, S. (2025) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103299
Spithoven, A., & Wei, Y. (2025) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-05-2024-0614
Hsu, W.-Y. (2025) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2025.102974
Charman, K., & Lim, S. (2025) · Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology · doi:10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6384
“Knowledge sharing inter-or intra-organization was determined by communication, learning intent, mutual commitment, trust, and absorptive capacity as referring to research conducted by Van Wijk, et al. [2] in many different kinds of industries.”
R&D Cooperation and Absorptive Capacity of Russian Organizations
Samovoleva, S. (2024) · Science management theory and practice · doi:10.19181/smtp.2024.6.2.10
Morimoto, K., Ikegami, M., & Sugihara, T. (2023) · Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology · doi:10.23919/picmet59654.2023.10216842
Fossatti, E. C., & Mozzato, A. R. (2023) · Cadernos EBAPE.BR · doi:10.1590/1679-395120220101
Formación de los colaboradores en las empresas del sector minero-energético en Colombia.
Rodríguez, Y. G., Niño-Villamizar, Y. A., Plata, M. E. N., & Sánchez, G. M. R. (2022) · Revista Escuela de Administracion de Negocios · doi:10.21158/01208160.n92.2022.3547
Review of Literature on Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Employees
Acharya, S. M., & Ganesha, H. R. (2022) · International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters · doi:10.47992/ijaeml.2581.7000.0147
Hasnain, S. S. (2022) · European Conference on Knowledge Management · doi:10.34190/eckm.23.1.526
“In brief, the knowledge contributors are convincing themselves about the competencies of the recipients or beneficiaries, before transferral (Levin and Cross, 2004; van Wijk et al., 2008).”
BackgroundWesteren, K., & Simila, J. (2022) · Informe GEPEC · doi:10.48075/igepec.v26i1.27662
“Knowledge transfers have been researched for decades and at the organizational level previous research have demonstrated that outcomes like improved organizational performance and innovativeness are significantly and positively correlated with knowledge transfer (Van Wijk et al., 2008).”
BackgroundREADINESS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS TO PARTICIPATE IN EMPIRICAL DATA EXCHANGE: PILOT STUDY IN UKRAINE
Zhornova, O., Zhornova, O., Lut, K., Romanenko, A., & Ryndenko, O. (2021) · AD ALTA: 11/02 · doi:10.33543/1102217222
RELIABLE AND VALID MEASUREMENT SCALES FOR DETERMINANTS OF THE WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT KNOWLEDGE
Waveren, C. V., Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Pretorius, T. (2021) · The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering · doi:10.7166/32-1-2389
“120 contexts implies that one has to look at the recipients of the knowledge generated in previous projects inside or outside the organisation [9].”
BackgroundDiniz, D., de Mendonça, F. M., de Oliveira, F. B., & Sant'Anna, A. D. S. (2020) · Cadernos EBAPE.BR · doi:10.1590/1679-395175538x
Boer, P., & Ihlenburg, D. (2020) · Athens Journal of Τechnology & Engineering · doi:10.30958/ajte.7-1-4
Szász, L., Rácz, B.-G., Borza, A., & Benedek, B. (2019) · Acta Oeconomica · doi:10.1556/032.2019.69.s2.5
Xie, X.-C. (2019) · doi:10.5194/acp-2019-653-ac4
What Leads to Knowledge Donation in Free Software Communities?
Balle, A., Oliveira, M., & Nodari, F. (2019) · Base · doi:10.4013/base.2019.163.03
“Different factors and conditions can influence knowledge sharing, its consequences and moderators (Wijk et al. , 2008).”
BackgroundBilgi Paylaşımı, Yenilik ve İşletme Grubuna Bağlılığın Rolü
Özen, Ö. (2018) · Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD) · doi:10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.400052
“The literature generally suggests a favourable impact of knowledge sharing on innovation, firm performance and competitive advantage (Argote and Ingram, 2000; Hansen, 1999, 2002; Miller, Fern and Cardinal, 2007; Tsai, 2001; van Wijk et al., 2008).”
Background(2018) · Les conditions de réussite des joint-ventures internationales en Algérie · doi:10.3917/ems.bouac.2018.01.0121
Sociale netwerken en cardiovasculair risicomanagement
Heijmans, N., van Lieshout, J., & Wensing, M. (2018) · Huisarts en Wetenschap · doi:10.1007/s12445-018-0185-1
Ryoo, J.-H. (2017) · 대한경영학회지 · doi:10.18032/kaaba.2017.30.11.1907
“As one of the fundamental goals of international acquisition, knowledge transfer plays an important role in realizing value creation and capturing synergy from partnering firms (Perez-Nordvedt et al., 2008; Ranft & Lord, 2002; Wijk et al., 2008).”
InfluentialStudy on the Relationship of Guanxi, Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Behavior
Wang, J.-R., & Yang, J. (2017) · International Conference on Management Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/icmse.2017.8574406
“A similar point was made by Van Wijk et al.[12] who suggest that knowledge sharing in spite of internal organization or inter-organization play an important role in promoting innovation.”
ResultIt is All about the Interface: Factors Which Drive Process Interface Criticality in Organzations
Lederer, M., & Heider, L. (2016) · EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications · doi:10.1109/seaa.2016.52
Lindahl, O. (2016) · doi:10.46697/001c.16883
“In exploring influences on effectiveness in headquarters-driven transfers of capabilities to subunits, this study answers the call for research by van Wijk et al. (2008) who found that the effects of headquarters on the outcome of transfers has scarcely been covered in extant literature.”
ResultZerwas, C., Bertram, M., & von Korflesch, H. F. O. (2016) · doi:10.3790/zfke.64.3.213
Interfirm Alliance Interactions and knowledge Learning: A Conceptual Research Model
Ding, Q., & Akoorie, M. (2016) · doi:10.12816/0035638
“A key challenge in studying knowledge transfer is how to adequately specify the actors involved, the contents to be transferred, as well as the channels in “facilitating” the transfer (Ding et al., 2009b; Van Wijk et al., 2008).”
BackgroundThe Effect of Network Characteristics on Technology Performance
Kim, H.-C., & 윤, 우. (2015) · 전략경영연구 · doi:10.17786/jsm.2015.18.3.003
Social Capital and Usefulness of External Knowledge: The Moderating Role of Group Affiliation
Wagner, H., & Moos, B. (2015) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2015.468
Individual and Organizational Effects of Knowledge Production: A Multi-Level Study
Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2014) · Spiral (Imperial College London) · doi:10.25560/24787
Lorenz, A. (2014) · DepositOnce · doi:10.14279/depositonce-4095 · Cited by 1
Organizational design of research results transfer offices: systematic revision of the literature
Berrío, S. P. R., Ospina, A. F. B., & Martínez, E. J. R. (2014) · PUNTO DE VISTA · doi:10.15765/pdv.v5i8.492 · Cited by 2
Interaction with science: In what sense a case of learning by doing?
Broström, A. (2014) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/sct043
Chen, Y.-C., & Guo, D.-Q. (2013) · doi:10.3923/jas.2013.3608.3611
Five Essays on the Effect of IP Infringement on Management and Company Strategy
Veer, T. (2013) · DepositOnce · doi:10.14279/depositonce-3751
Routines, dominant logic and market dynamism: Reconfiguration challenges in Alberta's oil sands
der Byl, V., & Alexandra, C. A. (2013) · Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) · doi:10.11575/prism/27696
Insight into Intra-organizational Learning and Knowledge Management
Junaid, M. (2012) · Independent Journal of Management & Production · doi:10.14807/ijmp.v3i2.42
Ming, L., & Ren, H. (2011) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1109/aimsec.2011.6011463
“A centrally located unit can not only control over information flow, but also control and exploit worthwhile opportunities for knowledge transfer (Van Wijk et al.�» 2008)[ 28 ].”
RetractedKnowledge Transfer in German Hospitals
Virgillito, A., Wilkesmann, M., & Wilkesmann, U. (2011) · Technische Universität Dortmund Eldorado (Technische Universität Dortmund) · doi:10.17877/de290r-548
Antecedents and consequences of individual absorptive capacity in times of crisis
de Sousa, R. C. F., da Costa, P. R., da Silva, L. F., Ruas, R. L., & Dias, C. N. (2025) · RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie · doi:10.1590/1678-6971/eramd250399
Creative Adaptation of Knowledge Resources: Evidence from Early-Stage Entrepreneurs
Shi, W. (2024) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2024.656
“Knowledge ambiguity refers to “the inherent and irreducible uncertainty as to precisely what the underlying knowledge components and sources are and how they interact” (Van Wijk et al. , 2008).”
Social Capital and Knowledge Networks of Software Developers
Balijepally, V., & Nerur, S. (2021) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3702-5.ch064
Makarchi, A., Dezfoulian, H., & Samouei, P. (2022) · International Journal of Engineering · doi:10.5829/ije.2022.35.06c.07
“Knowledge can be transferred between organizations (inter-organizational) or within an organization (intra-organizational) [3].”
BackgroundChauvet, V. (2022) · Management International · doi:10.7202/1092162ar
Corporate Social Responsibility and the Local Community Effect
Vial, I. D., Martínez, J. A. B., & López-Sanchez, M. (2020) · Advances in business strategy and competitive advantage book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4833-2.ch009
Máynez, A., Zorrilla-Nuñez, H., Ochoa-Zezzatti, A., & Gómez, A. H. (2021) · Technological and Industrial Applications Associated With Industry 4.0 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68663-5_7
Alternative perspectives in studying acquisitions
Savović, S. (2019) · Revizor · doi:10.5937/rev1988021s
Joubert, L., & Paraponaris, C. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71434-9_14 · Cited by 4
Organising Innovative Knowledge Transfer through Corporate Board Interlocks
Aalbers, H. L., & Klaasse, B. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71434-9_15
Knowledge Transfer Between R&D Projects and Commercial Projects: A Conceptual Framework
Too, E. G., & Bird, S. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_87
Human Resource Management in Post-Bureaucratic Organizations
Gabrielli, G., & Zaccaro, F. (2017) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1983-6.ch012
Nguyen, T. (2016) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17057999 · Cited by 1
Schenk, J. (2015) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-4196
“Many cities, especially in the United States, have sport councils or commissions (e.g., Toronto Sports Council, Ottawa Sport Council, North Vancouver Sport Council, Richmond Sports Council, Utah Sports Council, Chicago Sports Commission for Sport Tourism, Greater Cleveland Sports Commission, etc.), which arguably coul…”
BackgroundInfluentialLauzon, N. (2015) · doi:10.15640/jehd.v4n1a14
“It is an element that supports the perspective that coaching appears to be a process in which organizational actors discuss ideas, receive knowledge and are influenced by the other’s experience, as suggested by Van Wijk et al. (2008).”
BackgroundKNOWLEDGE TRANSFER MECHANISMS FOR EFFECTIVE DECISION-MAKING
Govender, P. (2014) · doi:10.22495/cocv11i2c2p2
Bareil, C. (2014) · Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations · doi:10.1016/s1420-2530(16)30025-5
Knowledge transfer methods between founder firms and corporate foundations
Minciullo, M., & Pedrini, M. (2013) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2013.15601abstract
Information and Knowledge Sharing in Inter-organizational Relationships under the Process Approach
Lage, E., & Alturas, B. (2012) · International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management · doi:10.5220/0004139202730276
“It seems that the term knowledge transfer has gained more notoriety, considering theoretical reviews on the subject that favored this term (Wijk et al., 2008; Easterby-Smith et al., 2008; Martinkenaite, 2011) as well as conferences that used this designation (http:// inkt12.”
BackgroundTippmann, E., Scott, P. S., & Mangematin, V. (2011) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230305106_16
“…focal unit, as an indicator for the concentration and scope of knowledge at the focal unit (Gupta and Govindarajan 1991, Hansen and Løvås 2004, van Wijk et al. 2008); and structure of international operations, ranging from pan-regional to global responsibilities with focal units being regional…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J. P., & Lyles, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Van Wijk, Raymond
- ORCID
- Jansen, Justin J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 830-853
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2007467847
- Cited by
- 1,335
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 84
- FWCI
- 137.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Keywords
- organizational knowledge transfer, inter-organizational knowledge transfer, intra-organizational knowledge transfer, knowledge networks, moderating effect, measurement properties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review