The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inter‐ and Intra‐Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences
Abstract
abstract Research on organizational knowledge transfer is burgeoning, and yet our understanding of its antecedents and consequences remains rather unclear. Although conceptual and qualitative reviews of the organizational knowledge transfer literature have emerged, no study has attempted to summarize previous quantitative empirical findings. As a first step towards that goal, we use meta‐analytic techniques to examine how knowledge, organization and network level antecedents differentially impact organizational knowledge transfer. Additionally, we consolidate research on the relationship between knowledge transfer and its consequences. We also demonstrate how the intra‐ and inter‐organizational context, the directionality of knowledge transfers, and measurement characteristics moderate the relationships studied. By aggregating and consolidating existing research, our study not only reveals new insights into the levers and outcomes of organizational knowledge transfer, but also provides meaningful directions for future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The development of recombination FSAs is also shaped by inter-unit, intra-MNE relationships as they define the degree to which a firm transmits knowledge to a subsidiary”
From Innovation in and from emerging economies: New insights and lessons for international business research (2021) · cites this paper as Van Wijk et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134367 · Cited by 9,665
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809
Research works printed but not linked: 103
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.388 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.2000.2883 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.387 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.13.3.274.2778 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400094 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00272-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490078 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208690 · DOI
- Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
- 10.2307/2393553 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/20159632 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1040.0075 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134 · DOI
- Cyert R., 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm
- 10.2307/256406 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.41.11.1750 · DOI
- 10.2307/1251915 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00096.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.021 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400098 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200002)21:2<99::AID-SMJ80>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-6486.00203 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.273 · DOI
- 10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.44 · DOI
- 10.2307/3152095 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0192 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
- Hambrick D. C., 1994, Research in Organizational Behavior, 171
- 10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.421 · DOI
- Hedges L. V., 1985, Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
- 10.1002/smj.4250150906 · DOI
- 10.2307/20159575 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-6486.00215 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281445 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amj.2005.19573106 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400107 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
- 10.2307/3069433 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.297 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00482.x · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.206 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2006.22527456 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.379 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490923 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490155 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.14.2.173.14997 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490156 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.14.3.297.15165 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.484 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400056 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250171108 · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400120 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840605050874 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.329 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00395-8 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.260 · DOI
- 10.1177/014920639902500406 · DOI
- 10.1111/1540-5885.00028 · DOI
- 10.2307/3556658 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/258107 · DOI
- 10.1509/jmkg.65.2.1.18253 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.398 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.49.6.751.16026 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::AID-SMJ93>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1 · DOI
- 10.2307/3069409 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.14.4.440.17483 · DOI
- 10.2307/259020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:7<595::AID-SMJ47>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
- 10.2307/256726 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2005.16928421 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.290 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8<831::AID-SMJ123>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
- 10.5465/AMJ.2005.16928394 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.163 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1040.0096 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.337 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200009)21:9<925::AID-SMJ129>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
- Tsai W., 2001, Knowledge transfer in intra‐organizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 996, 10.2307/3069443 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536 · DOI
- 10.2307/257085 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.251 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250160917 · DOI
- 10.2307/20159030 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1050.0126 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1040.0080 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.183 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.482 · DOI
- 10.2307/4134351 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.229 · DOI
- 10.2307/1556420 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.6.1.76 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840605051820 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.514.14423 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.8.3.209 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 982
Claro, D. P., & RAMOS, C. S. D. M. (2018) · Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management · doi:10.1080/08853134.2018.1437353 · Cited by 62
Kamaşak, R., Yavuz, M., & Altuntaş, G. (2016) · BuR - Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-016-0032-9 · Cited by 69
“First, this study once more showed the critical role of knowledge management on innovation performance (Van Wijk et al. 2008; Wu and Chen 2014).”
BackgroundCiabuschi, F., Dellestrand, H., & Kappen, P. (2011) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-011-0068-1 · Cited by 66
“A recent study by Van Wijk et al. (2008) examines through a meta-analytic review the antecedents and consequences of knowledge transfer.”
BackgroundInfluentialIgnoring the Experts: Networks and Organizational Learning in the Public Sector
Siciliano, M. D. (2016) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muw052 · Cited by 77
Wang, X., Xi, Y., Xie, J., & Zhao, Y. (2017) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-03-2017-0091 · Cited by 63
Ahlvik, C. A., & Björkman, I. (2014) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.007 · Cited by 58
West, J. (2008) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00807.x · Cited by 56
“At the same time, research on knowledge transfer has shown the difficulty of transferring technology between organizations, particularly when the knowledge is ambiguous or the sending and receiving organization are dissimilar in culture or structure (van Wijk et al, 2008).”
Tang, M., & Werner, C. H. (2017) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.001 · Cited by 59
Network learning: episodes of interorganizational learning towards a collective performance goal
Gibb, J., Sune, A., & Albers, S. (2017) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2016.09.001 · Cited by 54
“The knowledge transfer literature (e.g., see reviews by EasterbySmith et al., 2008; van Wijk et al., 2008) regularly affirms the importance of interorganizational knowledge exchange on performance and innovativeness for those organizations involved.”
BackgroundThe effects of virtual reality on EFL learning: A meta-analysis
bin Qiu, X., Shan, C., Yao, J., & Fu, Q. K. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11738-0 · Cited by 54
“We also used the fail-safe N to estimate the number of undiscovered null studies that would need to be discovered before the observed effect would no longer be statistically significant (Van Wijk et al., 2008).”
Reilly, M., & Scott, P. S. (2013) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.11.004 · Cited by 47
McGuinness, M., Demirbağ, M., & Bandara, S. (2012) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2012.03.013 · Cited by 60
Deriving value from inter‐organizational learning collaborations
Winkelen, C. V. (2010) · The Learning Organization · doi:10.1108/09696471011008215 · Cited by 51
Organizational prerequisites for knowledge creation and sharing: empirical evidence from Serbia
Stojanović-Aleksić, V., Nielsen, J. E., & Bošković, A. (2019) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-05-2018-0286 · Cited by 58
Vlajčić, D., Marzi, G., Caputo, A., & Dabić, M. (2018) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-05-2017-0129 · Cited by 69
Small business activity and knowledge exchange in informal interfirm networks
Martin‐Rios, C., & Erhardt, N. (2016) · International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1177/0266242616667540 · Cited by 59
An Empirical Test of the Relational View in the Context of Corporate Venture Capital
Weber, C., Bauke, B., & Raibulet, V. (2016) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1231 · Cited by 73
The Two Faces of Knowledge Search: New Solutions and Capability Development
Tippmann, E., Mangematin, V., & Scott, P. S. (2013) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840613485846 · Cited by 52
Corporate Venturing Deal Syndication and Innovation: the Information Exchange Paradox
Anokhin, S. A., Örtqvist, D., Thorgren, S., & Wincent, J. (2011) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2010.12.005 · Cited by 54
Subsidiary managers’ knowledge mobilizations: Unpacking emergent knowledge flows
Tippmann, E., Scott, P. S., & Mangematin, V. (2013) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2013.09.001 · Cited by 52
“…sizes, indicating different levels of knowledge stocks (Gupta & Govindarajan, 2000; van Wijk, Jansen, & Lyles, 2008), and had different numbers and types of mandates, a sign of the concentration and scope of their knowledge (Gupta & Govindarajan, 2000; Hansen & Løvås, 2004; van Wijk et al., 2008).”
BackgroundPark, C., Vertinsky, I. B., & Lee, C. (2012) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/02651331211216961 · Cited by 53
Wang, H., Zheng, L. J., Zhang, Z., Kumar, A., & Srivastava, P. R. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122974 · Cited by 58
Yildiz, H. E., Murtic, A., Zander, U., & Richtnér, A. D. (2018) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-018-0367-x · Cited by 66
Learning culture and knowledge management processes: to what extent are they effectively related?
Schmitz, S., Rebelo, T., Gracia, F., & Tomás, I. (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.rpto.2014.11.003 · Cited by 50
“Along the same lines, Van Wijk, Jansen, and Lyles (2008) pointed out that there are few studies that have looked at the relationship between culture and knowledge transfer.”
BackgroundZhou, Q., Deng, X., Hwang, B., & Ji, W. (2020) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000828 · Cited by 58
Hammami, H., Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2013) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.07.008 · Cited by 49
Kassaneh, T. C., Bolisani, E., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13052956 · Cited by 48
“The application of KM can be seen at either an intra-organizational or an interorganizational level [13,14].”
BackgroundFreitas, I. M. B., & Fontana, R. (2017) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12432 · Cited by 49
The absorptive capacity of family firms
Andersén, J. (2015) · Journal of Family Business Management · doi:10.1108/jfbm-05-2014-0012 · Cited by 45
Knowledge sharing between different generations of employees: an example from Slovenia
Brčić, Ž. J., & Mihelič, K. K. (2015) · Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja · doi:10.1080/1331677x.2015.1092308 · Cited by 57
An integrative model for knowledge transfer between new product development project teams
Frank, A. G., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2012) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1057/kmrp.2012.57 · Cited by 47
“Finally, there are studies that employ other terminologies for the KT concept (Antoni et al, 2005; van Wijk et al, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodStrategic Implications for (Non-Equity) Alliance Performance
Gudergan, S. P., Devinney, T. M., Richter, N., & Ellis, R. S. (2012) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.002 · Cited by 47
Zhao, Y.-S., & Lavin, M. (2012) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919612003782 · Cited by 48
Examining knowledge transfer and networks: an overview of the last twenty years
Serrano, M. F., Fuentelsaz, L., & Martínez, M. P. L. (2021) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-04-2021-0265 · Cited by 71
Knowledge sharing and the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analysis review
Jalili, Y. A., & Ghaleh, S. (2020) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-02-2019-0023 · Cited by 60
Li, Y., Cui, V., & Liu, H. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.028 · Cited by 59
The role of organizational and social capital in the firm's absorptive capacity
Aribi, A., & Dupouet, O. (2015) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-05-2015-0169 · Cited by 47
The Effect of the Distance between Partners' Knowledge Components on Collaborative Innovation
Schulze, A., & Brojerdi, G. (2012) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/j.1740-4762.2012.01031.x · Cited by 47
Using value analysis to support knowledge transfer in the multi-project setting
Formentini, M., & Romano, P. (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.01.023 · Cited by 47
Wensing, M., van Lieshout, J., Koetsenruijter, J., & Reeves, D. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-3 · Cited by 46
Anand, A., Agarwal, U. A., & Offergelt, F. (2022) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-04-2021-0248 · Cited by 55
Hilkenmeier, F., Fechtelpeter, C., & Decius, J. (2021) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-021-09913-x · Cited by 46
“As pointed out by many scholars (e.g., Bishop et al., 2011; de Wit-de Vries et al., 2019; Fernandes et al., 2017; van Wijk et al., 2008), the capability of firms to assimilate and apply new knowledge is a necessary require - ment for successful technology transfer.”
InfluentialKnowledge management in franchising: a research agenda
Iddy, J. J., & Alon, I. (2019) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-07-2018-0441 · Cited by 57
Walter, J. (2012) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00693.x · Cited by 46
“…learning curve advantages, and most importantly, complementary assets which allow them to better exploit innovations (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990; van Wijk et al., 2008), large firms also have a number of innovation disadvantages, such as rigidities and bureaucratic inertia, incentive systems…”
Knowledge management practices and innovation: A deliberate innovation management model for SMEs
Zhou, H., Uhlaner, L. M., & Jungst, M. (2021) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1080/00472778.2021.1888383 · Cited by 57
“…managers and employees within the organization, including the distribution and interpretation of such knowledge, thereby enhancing collective knowledge within the firm (De Jong & Vermeulen, 2006; López-Nicolás & Meroño-Cerdán, 2011; Uhlaner et al., 2013; Uit Beijerse, 2000; Van Wijk et al., 2008).”
BackgroundMethodCenamor, J., Parida, V., Oghazi, P., Pesämaa, O., & Wincent, J. (2017) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.06.002 · Cited by 45
Knowledge donating and knowledge collecting
Dysvik, A., Buch, R., & Kuvaas, B. (2015) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-11-2012-0145 · Cited by 58
“Knowledge-sharing, or the process of mutually exchanging knowledge and together creating new knowledge (de Vries et al., 2006), is recognized as a source of competitive advantage (Grant, 1996, Riege, 2005) and innovativeness (Collins and Smith, 2006, van Wijk et al., 2008).”
BackgroundBoh, W. F., & Wong, S. S. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.008 · Cited by 43
Ai, Q., & Tan, H. (2017) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-017-9518-z · Cited by 44
Pesch, R., & Bouncken, R. B. (2017) · Cross Cultural & Strategic Management · doi:10.1108/ccsm-03-2016-0065 · Cited by 44
Stettler, T. R., Moosauer, E. J., Schweiger, S. A., Baldauf, A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2024) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12758 · Cited by 57
Integration capacity and knowledge‐based acquisition performance
Lamont, B. T., King, D. R., Maslach, D. J., Schwerdtfeger, M. T., & Tienari, J. (2018) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12336 · Cited by 50
Expatriate knowledge utilization and MNE performance: A multilevel framework
González, J. A., & Chakraborty, S. (2014) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2014.03.001 · Cited by 46
Chinese Cross-Border M&A: Past Achievement, Contemporary Debates and Future Direction
Liu, Y., & Deng, P. (2014) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1479-361x20140000013004 · Cited by 45
Rethinking the effect of ESG practices on profitability through cross-dimensional substitutability
Taddeo, S., Agnese, P., & Busato, F. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120115 · Cited by 53
Robertson, J., McCarthy, I. P., & PITT, L. F. (2019) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1080/14778238.2019.1589396 · Cited by 46
“…various social capital dimensions that facilitate knowledge transfer across di ff erent network types have also been thoroughly explored (Argote, McEvily, & Reagans, 2003; Carayannis, Alexander, & Ioannidis, 2000; Inkpen & Tsang, 2005; Manning, 2010; Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998; van Wijk et al., 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialSheng, M. L. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.008 · Cited by 44
Gorovaia, N., & Windsperger, J. (2011) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2011.632003 · Cited by 42
Bagorogoza, J. K., & de Waal, A. (2010) · World Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development · doi:10.1108/20425961201000023 · Cited by 40
Supply chain disruptions: the influence of industry and geography on firm reaction speed
Lawson, B., Potter, A., Pil, F. K., & Holweg, M. (2019) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-04-2018-0225 · Cited by 49
Industry specific effects on innovation performance in China
Guan, J.-C., & Pang, L. (2017) · China Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2017.03.013 · Cited by 40
Motivation, opportunity, and ability in knowledge transfer: a social network approach
Kang, M., & Kim, B. (2017) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1057/s41275-016-0045-3 · Cited by 46
“Although the strength of ties has been representing relational properties of networks, it considers only the intensity of network ties (Van Wijk et al. 2008).”
BackgroundDell’Anno, D., & Giudice, M. D. (2015) · Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1186/s13731-015-0028-2 · Cited by 41
“Absorptive capacity is considered by some authors (Lane and Lubatkin 1998; Zahra and George 2002; Carlsson 2005) a dynamic capability: a capability to renew an organization’s competences, achieving congruence with changing environments, which is able to influence the firm’s processes to build organizational capability…”
BackgroundFactors shaping organizational dynamics in strategic knowledge management
Venkitachalam, K., & Willmott, H. (2015) · doi:10.1057/kmrp.2013.54 · Cited by 40
Koendjbiharie, S. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2510233 · Cited by 7
Alexopoulos, A. N., & Buckley, F. (2013) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601113488939 · Cited by 60
Tepic, M., Trienekens, J. H., Hoste, R., & Omta, S. W. F. (2012) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.132787 · Cited by 38
The dynamics and evolution of knowledge transfer in international master franchise agreements
Brookes, M. (2014) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.07.005 · Cited by 48
Factors affecting the effect of exploitation and exploration on performance: A meta-analysis
Marín‐Idárraga, D. A., González, J. M. H., & Cabello‐Medina, C. (2020) · BRQ Business Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/2340944420972707 · Cited by 40
“For example, the meta-analysis carried out by Van Wijk et al. (2008) included, as a moderating factor, the way of capturing data (primary vs. secondary data).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialIssues and Trends in Causal Ambiguity Research: A Review and Assessment
Konlechner, S. W., & Ambrosini, V. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319836163 · Cited by 54
“…came increasing interest in the dynamics of leveraging knowledge through intra- and interorganizational knowledge transfer (Argote & Ingram, 2000; van Wijk et al., 2008) as well as knowledge sharing in networks (Foss, Husted, & Michailova, 2010; Kogut & Zander, 1992; Priestley & Samaddar, 2007).”
BackgroundBoadu, F., Xie, Y. H., Du, Y., & Dwomo-Fokuo, E. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10114208 · Cited by 42
“Van Wijk, Jansen and Lyles [76] assert that knowledge transfer aids firms to discover their innovation performance.”
BackgroundInfluentialKruijf, J. V., & Pahl‐Wostl, C. (2016) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.004 · Cited by 46
Impacts of using a performance measurement system in supply chain management: a case study
Laihonen, H., & Pekkola, S. (2016) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1181810 · Cited by 43
“A PMS stimulates knowledge transfer and learning (cf. van Wijk, Jansen, and Lyles 2008; Martinkenaite 2011; Phelps, Heidl, and Wadhwa 2012).”
BackgroundThe micro-processes during repatriate knowledge transfer: the repatriates’ perspective
Burmeister, A., Deller, J., Osland, J. S., Szkudlarek, B. A., Oddou, G. R., & Blakeney, R. N. (2015) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-01-2015-0011 · Cited by 47
“Thus, the results respond to the call for an analysis of the micro-processes during knowledge transfer processes (Van Wijk et al., 2008; Argote, 2013).”
ResultAdaptations to Knowledge Templates in Base‐of‐the‐Pyramid Markets: The Role of Social Interaction
Sutter, C. J., Kistruck, G. M., & Morris, S. S. (2014) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1186 · Cited by 40
Improving operational performance through knowledge exchange with customers
Nagati, H., & Rebolledo, C. (2013) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2012.666843 · Cited by 39
“…empirical research by Lane et al. (2001) and Yli-Renko et al. (2001) that could not establish a direct link between trust and tacit knowledge transfer between organisations and provides additional evidence to the limitations of trust as an antecedent of knowledge exchange (van Wijk et al. 2008).”
BackgroundWindsperger, J., & Gorovaia, N. (2011) · Journal of Management & Governance · doi:10.1007/s10997-009-9126-5 · Cited by 39
“…and Zander 1992; Nonaka 1994; Szulanski 1995, 2000; Simonin 1999a,b; Argote 1999; Albino et al. 1999; Ancori et al. 2000; Argote et al. 2003; Bresman et al. 2003; Nonaka et al. 2003; Gertler 2003; Jensen and Szulanski 2007; Szulanski and Jensen 2006; Haas and Hansen 2007; van Wijk et al. 2008).”
BackgroundSupply chain agility and performance: evidence from a meta-analysis
Alfalla-Luque, R., Luján-García, D., & Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2023) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-05-2022-0316 · Cited by 63
The performance effects of corporate venture capital: a meta-analysis
Haslanger, P., Lehmann, E. E., & Seitz, N. (2022) · Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-022-09954-w · Cited by 38
Bader, B., Schuster, T., Bader, A., & Shaffer, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Global Mobility · doi:10.1108/jgm-06-2019-070 · Cited by 38
Bharati, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2018) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-018-9839-6 · Cited by 41
“^ Similarly, B Surprisingly little theoretical and empirical research has considered in a systematic way how social capital affects organizational performance outcomes ^ (Van Wijk et al. 2008).”
Sourcing in or out: Implications for social capital and knowledge sharing
Zimmermann, A., Oshri, I., Lioliou, E., & Gerbasi, A. (2017) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.05.001 · Cited by 36
A resource-based analysis of realized knowledge relatedness in diversified firms
Villasalero, M. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.011 · Cited by 38
A Collaboration-Based Model of Work Motivation and Role Ambiguity in Public Organizations
Campbell, J. W. (2016) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1137763 · Cited by 52
In Search of Platforms to Increase Market Responsiveness: Evidence from Foreign Subsidiaries
Lee, R. P., Chen, Q., & Lu, X. (2009) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jimk.17.2.59 · Cited by 34
Nikiforou, A., Lioukas, S. K., & Voudouris, I. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.008 · Cited by 44
Building absorptive capacity through firm openness in the context of a less-open country
Aliasghar, O., Rose, E. L., & Chetty, S. (2018) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.11.007 · Cited by 41
Inter-organizational fit and environmental innovation in supply chains
Shou, Y., Che, W., Dai, J., & Jia, F. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2017-0470 · Cited by 50
The ceiling to coproduction in university–industry research collaboration
McCabe, A., Parker, R., & Cox, S. (2016) · doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1107888 · Cited by 37
The Forthcoming Generational Workforce Transition and Rethinking Organizational Knowledge Transfer
Starks, A. (2013) · doi:10.1080/15350770.2013.810494 · Cited by 37
“In the Nahapiet and Ghoshal (as cited in van Wijk et al., 2008) study, the cognitive dimension referred to “the resources within relationships that provide shared representations, interpretations, and systems of meaning” (p. 835).”
BackgroundHuang, Y., Lin, H.-C., & Lee, H.-M. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122247 · Cited by 38
The European university alliances—an examination of organizational potentials and perils
Maassen, P., Stensaker, B., & Rosso, A. (2022) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00951-4 · Cited by 36
“If new practices and processes in an alliance deviate too much from existing ways of doing things, individual members may find it easier to withdraw from the alliance or to be less engaged in joint activities (van Wijk et al., 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialDemand and willingness for knowledge transfer in springboard subsidiaries of Chinese multinationals
Su, C., Kong, L., Ciabuschi, F., & Holm, U. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.014 · Cited by 41
Brand management in mergers and acquisitions
Liu, Y., Öberg, C., Tarba, S. Y., & Xing, Y. (2018) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/imr-01-2017-0011 · Cited by 40
Knowledge inflows effects on middle managers’ ambidexterity and performance
Torres, J. P., Drago, C., & Aqueveque, C. (2015) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-04-2015-0133 · Cited by 39
Tian, Y. W., Li, Y., & Wei, Z. (2013) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2177 · Cited by 37
SMEs’ Open Innovation: Applying a Barrier Approach
Dubouloz, S., Bocquet, R., Balzli, C. E., Gardet, E., & Gandia, R. (2021) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/00081256211052679 · Cited by 35
Future changes in sourcing patterns: 2025 outlook for the Swedish textile industry
Gadde, L.-E., & Jonsson, P. (2019) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2018.12.004 · Cited by 35
Tao, F., Liu, X., Gao, L., & Xia, E. (2017) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1284883 · Cited by 35
HR practices, context and knowledge transfer in M&A
Yahiaoui, D., Chebbi, H., & Weber, Y. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1226192 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J. P., & Lyles, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Van Wijk, Raymond
- ORCID
- Jansen, Justin J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 830-853
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2007467847
- Cited by
- 1,335
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 84
- FWCI
- 137.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Keywords
- organizational knowledge transfer, inter-organizational knowledge transfer, intra-organizational knowledge transfer, knowledge networks, moderating effect, measurement properties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review