The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract
This paper consolidates the state of academic research on innovation. Based on a systematic review of literature published over the past 27 years, we synthesize various research perspectives into a comprehensive multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation – linking leadership, innovation as a process, and innovation as an outcome. We also suggest measures of determinants of organizational innovation and present implications for both research and managerial practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809
The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.
Amabile, T. M. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 · Cited by 4,034
Explaining Development and Change in Organizations
van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329 · Cited by 3,762
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1920110 · Cited by 3,470
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250030102 · Cited by 2,758
Is the Resource-Based "View" a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes
Barney, J. B. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259393 · Cited by 2,734
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426
Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives
Locke, E. A. (1968) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4 · Cited by 2,409 · cited 2×
“…several areas of social sciences: from Marx and Braveman’s labour process theory (Knights and Willmott, 1990) to process theories of human behaviour (motivational theories: Adams, 1963, 1965; Kahler, 1975; Locke, 1968, 2001; Vroom, 1964) and cognition (information processing theory: Miller, 1956).”
BackgroundAging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation
Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666980 · Cited by 1,862
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747
Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/196734.196745 · Cited by 1,736
Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094828 · Cited by 1,729
Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x · Cited by 1,410
The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.454 · Cited by 912 · cited 1×
“We chose to limit our sources to peer-reviewed journals because these can be considered validated knowledge and are likely to have the highest impact in the field (Podsakoff et al., 2005).”
BackgroundEngeström, Y. (1993) · Understanding Practice · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625510.004 · Cited by 853
Bunge, M. (1997) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/004839319702700402 · Cited by 620
Comments on “What theory is not”
DiMaggio, P. J. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393790 · Cited by 488 · cited 1×
“We take as a starting point the objective of most theories: to describe, predict and/or explain the phenomena of interest in a field (Bunge, 1997; DiMaggio, 1995; Sutton and Staw, 1995; Weick, 1995) by establishing correlations and, if possible, causality between constructs.”
BackgroundLeadership clarity and team innovation in health care
West, M. A., Borrill, C. S., Dawson, J. F., Brodbeck, F., Shapiro, D. A., & Haward, B. (2003) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(03)00044-4 · Cited by 379
What separates Japanese new product winners from losers
Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1996) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1350422 · Cited by 311
Innovation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Recent Research
Länsisalmi, H., Kivimäki, M., Aalto, P., & Ruoranen, R. (2006) · Nursing Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0894318405284129 · Cited by 262
Modelling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approaches
King, N. (1992) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00487.x · Cited by 193
Cited by
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12639 · Cited by 2,550
Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A., & Trichina, E. (2022) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1871398 · Cited by 1,134
“To delineate research patterns and discern avenues for future studies related to intelligent automation in HRM, we conducted a systematic literature review following the suggestions made by Tranfield et al. (2003) as well as Crossan and Apaydin (2010).”
MethodAdams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12102 · Cited by 995
The role of leadership in a digitalized world: a review
Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938 · Cited by 808
Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-020-00134-w · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-20
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1154-1191
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2115519090
- Cited by
- 3,244
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 31.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
