The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HRM Practices, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, and Performance: A Multi‐Level Analysis
Open accessAbstract
We examine the relationship between HRM practices, conceptualized at the workplace level, and individual employee attitudes and behaviour. We focus on two possible explanations for the relationship: social exchange and job influence/employee discretion. Findings from a study of employees in North‐East England suggest that there is a positive impact of HRM practices on organizational citizenship behaviour, through an effect on perceived job influence/discretion. There was no such effect for perceived organizational support. These findings provide support for a job influence and opportunity explanation of HRM effects on employee attitudes and behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305279602 · Cited by 10,068
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600307 · Cited by 5,897
Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.68.4.653 · Cited by 4,043
Moorman, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.6.845 · Cited by 3,422
Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2004.12736076 · Cited by 2,996
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303
CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL EXCHANGE.
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256704 · Cited by 1,929
Cited by
Alfes, K., Shantz, A. D., Truss, C., & Soane, E. C. (2013) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.679950 · Cited by 770
Empowerment—Fad or Fab? A Multilevel Review of the Past Two Decades of Research
Maynard, M. T., Gilson, L. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312438773 · Cited by 477
Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T. A. M., & De Jong, S. B. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12028 · Cited by 324
Vu, T., Vo‐Thanh, T., Chi, H., Nguyen, N. P., Nguyen, D. V., & Zaman, M. (2022) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22101 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Snape, E., & Redman, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12-24
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1219-1247
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2003238320
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 11.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HRM Practices, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, and Performance: A Multi‐Level Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00911.x
- The paper
- Snape, E., & Redman, T. (2010). HRM Practices, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, and Performance: A Multi‐Level Analysis. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00911.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
