Cited by 217Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPersonality Traits and Psychology

The impact of personality on behavior in five Prisoner's Dilemma games

Boone, Christophe, De Brabander, Bert, van Witteloostuijn, Arjen·1999·Journal of Economic Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-4870(99)00012-4

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boone, C., De Brabander, B., & van Witteloostuijn, A.
Corresponding author
Boone, Christophe
Venue
Journal of Economic Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
343-377
ISSN
0167-4870 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051915840
Cited by
217
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Economic Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
personality, prisoner's dilemma, cooperation, competitive behavior, locus of control, self-monitoring, Type A behavior pattern, sensation seeking, non-cooperative game, homo economicus, behavioral economics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review