CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 171Personality Traits and PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Contextualizing Personality Psychology

Roberts, Brent W.·2007·Journal of Personality
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00467.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ABSTRACT The issue of how to contextualize personality psychology constructively has been a longstanding dilemma. This special issue brings together personality, social, self, clinical, and cultural psychologists who have attempted to contextualize the self, personality, attachment, and cultural constructs in an integrative fashion, with a focus on broader situations, such as social roles. In this introductory essay, I describe the potential advantages of integrating traditional concepts in personality psychology with social roles and provide an overview of the contributions made to the special issue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00467.x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While mortality risk due to low IQ is partially associated with mortality risk due to low SES, the role of maladaptive personality traits in these associations has been rarely studied.

    “Another area for further study is the interface between IQ, personality, and SES links to longevity: while mortality risk due to low IQ is partially associated with mortality risk due to low SES, the role of maladaptive personality traits in these associations has been rarely studied [37].”

    From Personality and Longevity: Knowns, Unknowns, and Implications for Public Health and Personalized Medicine (2011) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Roberts, B. W.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Brent W.
ORCID
Roberts, Brent W.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09-17
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
1071-1082
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00467.x
OpenAlex
W2097068070
Cited by
171
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG19414, R03AG019414)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
personality psychology, social roles, self, attachment, cultural constructs, integrative theory, social psychology
MeSH terms
Cultural Characteristics, Ego, Humans, Internal-External Control, Models, Psychological, Personality, Personality Assessment, Personality Development, Research Design, Self Concept, Social Control, Informal, Temperament, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review