The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structures of Personality and Their Relevance to Psychopathology: II. Further Articulation of a Comprehensive Unified Trait Structure
Abstract
ABSTRACT There is increasing agreement that the current categorical system of personality disorders (PDs) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition ( DSM‐IV ; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) should be replaced by a trait dimensional scheme in DSM‐V . In particular, the consensus appears to be converging on a hierarchical Big Four model. The broad factors that form the apex of this hierarchy are essentially maladaptive variants of the Big Five traits of normal personality, minus Openness. We argue that this Big Four model is incomplete, however, in that it fails to model characteristics related to the “odd or eccentric” Cluster A PDs adequately. We report the results of three studies that examine these odd, eccentric characteristics in relation to basic dimensions of normal and abnormal personality. The results of these studies establish the existence of an Oddity factor that is (a) broader than the Cluster A traits and (b) distinct from Openness and the other Big Five dimensions. Consequently, its addition yields an alternative five‐factor model of personality pathology (considering only abnormal traits) and an expanded, integrated Big Six taxonomy that subsumes both normal and abnormal personality characteristics.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Watson, Clark and Chmielewski [2008] proposed that a fifth factor called Oddity is needed to model traits related to eccentricity.”
From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Watson, Clark and Chmielewski [2008]
In the citing paper
“In some studies these charac teristics overlap with eccentric and odd behaviour and/or paranoid personality disorder symptoms, and an additional factor, peculiarity, has been suggested to make up a six-fac tor model”
From Personality disorder: a new global perspective (2010) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
&NA; (1988) · Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/00002093-198802020-00022 · Cited by 12,603
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)
American Psychiatric Association (2000) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349 · Cited by 11,069
(1999) · Cited by 7,995
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530
Drake, M. M. (1988) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.42.10.683b · Cited by 5,303
Harman, H. H. (1960) · Cited by 5,148
Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale
BERNSTEIN, E. M., & PUTNAM, F. W. (1986) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004 · Cited by 3,793
Personality Development: Stability and Change
Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913 · Cited by 2,699
Merrifield, P. R., & Harman, H. H. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1161864 · Cited by 2,574
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Bentler P. M., 1995, EQS for Macintosh user's guide
- Carlson E. B., 1992, Manual for the Dissociative Experiences Scale
- Clark L. A., 1993, Manual for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality
- Clark L. A., Manual for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality—2nd Edition (SNAP‐2)
- Costa P. T., 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) and NEO Five‐Factor Inventory (NEO‐FFI) professional manual
- 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246 · DOI · Paper page
- Eysenck H. J., 1975, Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
- Gorsuch R. L., 1983, Factor analysis
- Hogan R., 1992, Hogan Personality Inventory Manual
- John O. P., 1999, Handbook of personality, 102
- Livesley W. J., Manual for the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology—Basic Questionnaire
- Stringer D. M., 2008, Explicating the nature of the Oddity domain
- Tellegen A., Personality measures: Development and evaluation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711002674 · Cited by 1,908
“Our preliminary factor analytic results suggest these traits delineate five higher-order domains that constitute a model synthesizing other empirically based maladaptive trait and disorder models in the literature (Harkness et al. 1995 ; Austin & Deary, 2000 ; Costa & Widiger, 2002 ; De Clercq et al. 2006 ; Clark, 200…”
BackgroundSelf-citationConstructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000626 · Cited by 1,470
“Nonetheless, demonstrating good convergent/discriminant validity between self-report and interview measures of constructs provides support for both methods (e.g., Dornbach-Bender et al., 2017; Watson et al., 2008).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationPersonality Psychology and Economics
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2011) · Handbook of the economics of education · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53444-6.00001-8 · Cited by 1,412
Personality Psychology and Economics
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w16822 · Cited by 540
“Wood, and Webb (2006). A practical problem facing the analyst who wishes to measure personality is the multiplicity of personality questionnaires.”
Personality Disorders in DSM-5
Skodol, A. E. (2012) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143131 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Chmielewski, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Watson, David
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-29
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1545-1586
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W1898515047
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 21.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- personality structure, personality disorders, Big Five personality traits, Cluster A personality disorders, openness to experience, psychopathology
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Community Participation, Emotions, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Iowa, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Neurotic Disorders, Personality, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Psychopathology, Students, Universities, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
