Cited by 201Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersMemory Processes and Influences

Nap‐dependent learning in infants

Open access
Hupbach, Almut, Gomez, Rebecca L., Bootzin, Richard R., Nadel, Lynn·2009·Developmental Science

Abstract

Sleep has been shown to aid a variety of learning and memory processes in adults ( Stickgold, 2005 ). Recently, we showed that infants’ learning also benefits from subsequent sleep such that infants who nap are able to abstract the general grammatical pattern of a briefly presented artificial language ( Gomez, Bootzin & Nadel, 2006 ). In the present study, we demonstrate, for the first time, long‐term effects of sleep on memory for an artificial language. Fifteen‐month‐old infants who had napped within 4 hours of language exposure remembered the general grammatical pattern of the language 24 hours later. In contrast, infants who had not napped shortly after being familiarized with the language showed no evidence of remembering anything about the language. Our findings support the view that infants’ frequent napping plays an essential role in establishing long‐term memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00837.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep promotes grammar-related abstraction processes in language learning tasks in infants.

    “Sleep likewise promoted grammar-related abstraction processes in language learning tasks in infants (469, 589).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [589]

  • The infant language-learning result was confirmed in a second study employing an extended retention interval of 24 h.

    “The results were confirmed in a second study of this group employing an extended retention interval of 24 h (589).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [589]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hupbach, A., Gomez, R. L., Bootzin, R. R., & Nadel, L.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Hupbach, Almut
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-14
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
1007-1012
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2120401186
Cited by
201
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0238584, CAREER)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
sleep-dependent learning, napping, infant memory, artificial languages, long-term memory, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, language acquisition
MeSH terms
Child Development, Female, Humans, Infant, Language, Language Tests, Learning, Male, Memory, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review